- Topic
As wmscog says Ahnshahnhong preached for 37 years from 1948 when he was baptized in SDA(Seventh day adventist) till his death in 1985 +3 years of Jesus Christ’s preaching = 40 years reign of King David (the reason for his qualification of 2nd coming/ the root of david). I want to ask wmscog –
Q1- why then he left SDA and opened a new church?
Q1a-Was SDA doctrine wrong? If yes :Then why he got baptized in a wrong doctrine? Didn’t he know it already being 2nd christ? (Possible Answer)-May be he had no other way because no “true” church existed.
Q1b-So why he took 16 years to open a new church? (Possible Answer)-Maybe because he had to do hard work (Stone carrying as shown in wmscog videos) for a living during the day and had little time in the night to write his books (why din’t Jesus write any book?).
Q1c-So why did God put so much burden on his shoulders? (Not fair. 1st coming christ had only 1 assignment. Poor 2nd coming.)
Q2- Was SDA right? Then why open a new doctrine?
Q3-As Ahnshahnhong started a new church in 1964 and stared preaching new ways of Gospel, then he only scored 1964 to 1985 =21 years. So he comes short 16 years to be eligible for Christship. Oooops!! (Christship is a new word I discovered due to the need on the “new age”). (Possible Solution)-May be they can add sweet 16 years of ‘mother’ who must not be a mother at that age i guess and must be beautiful to qualify to be the bride of the Lamb/Ahnshahnhong/….(somebody please write here the name of Mother’s fist husband)!!
I never said that the discipiles didnt know Judas was bad. you're going to have to quote that statement.
but in response to what you said. Of coarse I wasnt there however, Like i said I dont believe in Pastors or Brothers or Sisters I believe the bible. It is very clear that the one who brings the Passover is Christ himself (Revelation 2:17 Rev7:1-3 John 6:27 John 6:53 etc…) Who besides Christ Ahnsahnghong restored the Passover correctly according to the Bible. Herbet Armstrong didnt do it. His passover isnt correct according to the bible. We wont get into that. The point is, the bible teaches that whoever brings Passover is Christ. And Christ Ahnsahnghong did it. So He did what the Bible claims only Christ can do. So according to the bible he is christ. It is also written Luke 17-20-25….he(christ) must suffer many thing and be rejected by this generation. so in speaking of his 2nd coming he testified that he had to suffer. So Like i said i believe the bible. Why don't you belive the bible? Thats my question to you?
Judas is irrelevant to what i said actually
Judas is irrelevant to what i said actually
Also i should point out scripture doesn’t say only god can restore Passover. on the contrary it shows two sinners do so…
further wmscog doesn’t keep the seventh month biblicaly so the argument against Armstrong works against you
Also i should point out scripture doesn’t say only god can restore Passover. on the contrary it shows two sinners do so…
further wmscog doesn’t keep the seventh month biblicaly so the argument against Armstrong works against you
warrior wrote:
Hi The Unknown, that depends which book of the bible you read. According to John, Jesus was crucified on the passover day (which would mean he never actually kept it..)
John 19:14 – It was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about noon. “Here is your king,” Pilate said to the Jews. 15 But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!” “Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked. “We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered.16 Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified.
So which verse do you accept? Matthew (jesus keeping the passover and being crucified on friday) or John (jesus being crucified on the passover and not keeping it)
John 19:31 He died the day before Sabbath which is Friday
warrior wrote:
Hi The Unknown, that depends which book of the bible you read. According to John, Jesus was crucified on the passover day (which would mean he never actually kept it..)
John 19:14 – It was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about noon. “Here is your king,” Pilate said to the Jews. 15 But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!” “Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked. “We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered.16 Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified.
So which verse do you accept? Matthew (jesus keeping the passover and being crucified on friday) or John (jesus being crucified on the passover and not keeping it)
John 19:31 He died the day before Sabbath which is Friday
Luke 22:34 Jesus tells Peter he will deny Him 3 times. This is after they ate the bread and wine but on the same day. John 18:17 Peter denies Jesus for the 1st time. Same day though.
When I think about the movie, I remember Jesus being arrested while it was still light out. Is that how the movie goes? If so, that's wrong because Jesus was arrested after the PO at twighlight which is nearly dark time.
Luke 22:34 Jesus tells Peter he will deny Him 3 times. This is after they ate the bread and wine but on the same day. John 18:17 Peter denies Jesus for the 1st time. Same day though.
When I think about the movie, I remember Jesus being arrested while it was still light out. Is that how the movie goes? If so, that's wrong because Jesus was arrested after the PO at twighlight which is nearly dark time.
No one here proved wrong The unknown's statement of Jesus not being in the tomb for 72 hours, Storm tryed to use lev 23:32 saying that was about the sabbath, when it is about the day of Atonement, so his argument is "thrown out the window" Can't remember all the others but they are all weak. No one has proved The unknown's statement false. Jesus was not in the tomb for 3 days and 3 nights.
Also no one here can provide proof that is tangible that Christ Ahnsanhnghong was born to buddist family, and even if he was it makes no difference, the prophecy says "unbelievers" that means they just don't have to believe in God, so they can believe in budda, confucius, or Zues, Hera or whatever.
No one here proved wrong The unknown's statement of Jesus not being in the tomb for 72 hours, Storm tryed to use lev 23:32 saying that was about the sabbath, when it is about the day of Atonement, so his argument is "thrown out the window" Can't remember all the others but they are all weak. No one has proved The unknown's statement false. Jesus was not in the tomb for 3 days and 3 nights.
Also no one here can provide proof that is tangible that Christ Ahnsanhnghong was born to buddist family, and even if he was it makes no difference, the prophecy says "unbelievers" that means they just don't have to believe in God, so they can believe in budda, confucius, or Zues, Hera or whatever.
oliverlog wrote:
As wmscog says Ahnshahnhong preached for 37 years from 1948 when he was baptized in SDA(Seventh day adventist) till his death in 1985 +3 years of Jesus Christ's preaching = 40 years reign of King David (the reason for his qualification of 2nd coming/ the root of david). I want to ask wmscog –
Q1- why then he left SDA and opened a new church?
Because the SDA was not the true church and also it is prophecied that Christ would rebuild Zion! DUH!
Q1a-Was SDA doctrine wrong? If yes :Then why he got baptized in a wrong doctrine? Didn't he know it already being 2nd christ? (Possible Answer)-May be he had no other way because no "true" church existed.
Because it was the closest to the truth, it's better to be baptized in a church that atleast keeps Sabbath then a Church that has 0% truth! DUH!
Q1b-So why he took 16 years to open a new church? (Possible Answer)-Maybe because he had to do hard work (Stone carrying as shown in wmscog videos) for a living during the day and had little time in the night to write his books (why din't Jesus write any book?).
Rev, the church of Laodecia. The SDA was closer to the truth then Sun God worshipers, Christ Ahnsahnghong preached to them the truth and the errors of the SDA for the 16 years He was there. DUH!
Q1c-So why did God put so much burden on his shoulders? (Not fair. 1st coming christ had only 1 assignment. Poor 2nd coming.)
Stupid Question!
Q2- Was SDA right? Then why open a new doctrine?
My answers to your first couple questions answers this question.
Q3-As Ahnshahnhong started a new church in 1964 and stared preaching new ways of Gospel, then he only scored 1964 to 1985 =21 years. So he comes short 16 years to be eligible for Christship. Oooops!! (Christship is a new word I discovered due to the need on the "new age"). (Possible Solution)-May be they can add sweet 16 years of 'mother' who must not be a mother at that age i guess and must be beautiful to qualify to be the bride of the Lamb/Ahnshahnhong/….(somebody please write here the name of Mother's fist husband)!!
Answer – your an idiot!
This is the original post, which is not even worthy of a reply but I will reply to it because of everyones ignorance.
oliverlog wrote:
As wmscog says Ahnshahnhong preached for 37 years from 1948 when he was baptized in SDA(Seventh day adventist) till his death in 1985 +3 years of Jesus Christ's preaching = 40 years reign of King David (the reason for his qualification of 2nd coming/ the root of david). I want to ask wmscog –
Q1- why then he left SDA and opened a new church?
Because the SDA was not the true church and also it is prophecied that Christ would rebuild Zion! DUH!
Q1a-Was SDA doctrine wrong? If yes :Then why he got baptized in a wrong doctrine? Didn't he know it already being 2nd christ? (Possible Answer)-May be he had no other way because no "true" church existed.
Because it was the closest to the truth, it's better to be baptized in a church that atleast keeps Sabbath then a Church that has 0% truth! DUH!
Q1b-So why he took 16 years to open a new church? (Possible Answer)-Maybe because he had to do hard work (Stone carrying as shown in wmscog videos) for a living during the day and had little time in the night to write his books (why din't Jesus write any book?).
Rev, the church of Laodecia. The SDA was closer to the truth then Sun God worshipers, Christ Ahnsahnghong preached to them the truth and the errors of the SDA for the 16 years He was there. DUH!
Q1c-So why did God put so much burden on his shoulders? (Not fair. 1st coming christ had only 1 assignment. Poor 2nd coming.)
Stupid Question!
Q2- Was SDA right? Then why open a new doctrine?
My answers to your first couple questions answers this question.
Q3-As Ahnshahnhong started a new church in 1964 and stared preaching new ways of Gospel, then he only scored 1964 to 1985 =21 years. So he comes short 16 years to be eligible for Christship. Oooops!! (Christship is a new word I discovered due to the need on the "new age"). (Possible Solution)-May be they can add sweet 16 years of 'mother' who must not be a mother at that age i guess and must be beautiful to qualify to be the bride of the Lamb/Ahnshahnhong/….(somebody please write here the name of Mother's fist husband)!!
Answer – your an idiot!
This is the original post, which is not even worthy of a reply but I will reply to it because of everyones ignorance.
Hi! 1004 welcome to the forum want to explain it to us. By all means please educate us.
Hi! 1004 welcome to the forum want to explain it to us. By all means please educate us.
What in the world does Jesus being in the tomb for 72, 36 or 100 hours have to do with a false church? What does that have to do with a god who when he/she says good morning, you need to check the time because they could be lying that it's morning when in fact it's afternoon. A church whose true parents aka F&M have contradicted themselves. Why did your gods commit adultry? Divorce? Why? You defile the true word of God, the bible, with these blasphemous lies. What or who the hell do you (wmscog) guys think you are up against, dummies? No…. We got plenty in store too. Come on, bring it on, let's see just how much you can practice #1 teaching of your church mother.
What in the world does Jesus being in the tomb for 72, 36 or 100 hours have to do with a false church? What does that have to do with a god who when he/she says good morning, you need to check the time because they could be lying that it's morning when in fact it's afternoon. A church whose true parents aka F&M have contradicted themselves. Why did your gods commit adultry? Divorce? Why? You defile the true word of God, the bible, with these blasphemous lies. What or who the hell do you (wmscog) guys think you are up against, dummies? No…. We got plenty in store too. Come on, bring it on, let's see just how much you can practice #1 teaching of your church mother.
Yes dummies. You guys prove you are "dummies" because you fall for this, excuse my term "cr*p". Adultry? lolz you have evidence? No. Divorce? lolz, again show me. You defile yourselves with satan's army and slaves of the Sun God. Trampling the true words of God and God Themselves with disgusting and shamefull lies and deceit. Yes dummies..
Yes dummies. You guys prove you are "dummies" because you fall for this, excuse my term "cr*p". Adultry? lolz you have evidence? No. Divorce? lolz, again show me. You defile yourselves with satan's army and slaves of the Sun God. Trampling the true words of God and God Themselves with disgusting and shamefull lies and deceit. Yes dummies..
1004 wrote:
Yes dummies. You guys prove you are "dummies" because you fall for this, excuse my term "cr*p". Adultry? lolz you have evidence? No. Divorce? lolz, again show me. You defile yourselves with satan's army and slaves of the Sun God. Trampling the true words of God and God Themselves with disgusting and shamefull lies and deceit. Yes dummies..
A scam is a scam, period. It's a money making business. This site is fool of proof plus we each have our own real life story. I'm cool being called anything by Wmscog. I am not the type to stress that. I can take what I dish out.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.