- Topic
As wmscog says Ahnshahnhong preached for 37 years from 1948 when he was baptized in SDA(Seventh day adventist) till his death in 1985 +3 years of Jesus Christ’s preaching = 40 years reign of King David (the reason for his qualification of 2nd coming/ the root of david). I want to ask wmscog –
Q1- why then he left SDA and opened a new church?
Q1a-Was SDA doctrine wrong? If yes :Then why he got baptized in a wrong doctrine? Didn’t he know it already being 2nd christ? (Possible Answer)-May be he had no other way because no “true” church existed.
Q1b-So why he took 16 years to open a new church? (Possible Answer)-Maybe because he had to do hard work (Stone carrying as shown in wmscog videos) for a living during the day and had little time in the night to write his books (why din’t Jesus write any book?).
Q1c-So why did God put so much burden on his shoulders? (Not fair. 1st coming christ had only 1 assignment. Poor 2nd coming.)
Q2- Was SDA right? Then why open a new doctrine?
Q3-As Ahnshahnhong started a new church in 1964 and stared preaching new ways of Gospel, then he only scored 1964 to 1985 =21 years. So he comes short 16 years to be eligible for Christship. Oooops!! (Christship is a new word I discovered due to the need on the “new age”). (Possible Solution)-May be they can add sweet 16 years of ‘mother’ who must not be a mother at that age i guess and must be beautiful to qualify to be the bride of the Lamb/Ahnshahnhong/….(somebody please write here the name of Mother’s fist husband)!!
Disturbed do you know now why I call you an idiot, I can image you right now thinking you got something on us, all excited because finaly you think you have a smart reply for us, wagging your little stubby tail like a mut.
queen of heaven is isis and asherah in ancient mediteranian culture and the middle east. Thats who Jeremiah is talking about. Father and Mother please give this fool a bit of knowledge.. Here i prayed for you.
Wait let me guess, they didn't preach about it because it wasn't the proper "time" for it. Also, Ahnshanhnhong never preached about a mother. It was when he left, all of sudden it's preach mother time? If he wanted people to know, why didn't he preach about the subject?
Wow serg is the in house expert, "why didn't he preach about the subject" oh you are so smart, lolz *yawn* subject has already been prove ignorant, and the proof of father preaching about mother has already been made public.
You are adding to the bible you false prophet! You and your mama are the idiots to think you can deceive people and get away with it. No where in that chapter does it say worshipping Isis or asherah poles…it says the queen of heaven. Don’t you call Zhang the queen of heaven? DETESTABLE!!!!!
Your such an idiot. LOLZ LOLZ!!!!! you went and read it didn't you disturbed, your such a idiot! hahahaha!!!! Try looking up the history of the time of Jeremiah. Father and Mother please have patience he's just in idiot. Wow I prayed twice for disturbed.
He didn’t preach about mother. He allegedly took a picture. Woooo big evidence! With today’s technology anyone can photoshop. The church is Korea had to go back to the drawing board and show a newer photo which was also photoshopped.
Why would Ash (if he were God) marry a woman while still married to his first wife?! Doesn’t make since unless….he’s not God but a sinner like us
It’s a heated house tonight.
Disturbed, I have been asking the same question.
Didn’t need to retread it. I was a long term member and studied about the asherah poles and whatnot according to WMSCOG doctrine. You’re the idiot! Leading people to hell. But that’s what false prophets do right? They cannot get into heaven and prevent others from going as well. Don’t pray for me to your false god. I’ll take my chances praying in the name of JESUS
Ftos did "father" preach about mother for 37 years? If he didn't, why didn't he? In none of his books does he ever mention a mother. Care to explain the reason why he didn't? Yea I am soo ignorant so please answer…
FTOS has already explained everything in less words than I could have done with big paragraphs.
The rest of you are just going to keep arguing about it more, but we in the WMSCOG know he's right, your not fooling anyone.
Serg you know you were supposed to believe that wedding picture as proof that he proclaimed Zhang the bride (sarcasm). That should have been all the proof you needed. LOL
Ash said there’s no mother god. He knew of all things the bible teaches directly against it. It is DETESTABLE to God. Zhang is DETESTABLE to the Singular true God.
144000 wrote:
FTOS has already explained everything in less words than I could have done with big paragraphs.
The rest of you are just going to keep arguing about it more, but we in the WMSCOG know he's right, your not fooling anyone.
Yeah go on and each one of you say the other guy has explained. All FTOS has done is been abusive. Show me what he has explained to match the tpoic of this thread? Nothing. Now you might possibly say that Disturbed changed the topic to Jer 44 but back up a bit and you'll notice how FTOS introduced Babylon before her. It is a topic from which FTOS ran away.
I apologize Emil for getting off topic indirectly. At the end of the day Ash isnt God. It doesnt matter if he preached 37 or 21 years because he's not God nor did he fulfill ANY biblical prophecy.
There are so many holes in the story which cant be plugged in by the WMSCOG. They cant verify their true lineage other than to doctor up websites with info they want you to believe is true. They have misused ALL of Ash's writings by adding and subtracting to it to fit their misguided doctrine. Ash didnt do ANY miracles to prove he was the Christ. He was an adulterer by the way of WMSCOG's teaching…he married a woman while still being legally married to another. The Korean government was investigating him and his church! Notice that Zhang's exhusband said she sold their house and gave the money to the church.
Anyway Ash is not the Christ! Zhang is a false god
@Disturbed – no you were not the one who went OT. FTOS first introduced Babylon into the thread and your response was a natural result. They should declare on what their entire basis for that Babylon accusation is based. We can see the flimsy foundation.Anyway let us see whether 144000 and his kids come up with any evidence of the 37 year prediction. Resounding silence so far.
Emil, still waiting for you to answer my questions. Also if you don't accept my invitation, then you are just running from the truth. Don't say we never invited you.
fromtheotherside wrote:
Also if you don't accept my invitation, then you are just running from the truth. Don't say we never invited you.
Also I haven't accepted invitations to meet with ex-members to discuss control mechanisms and thought reform, so it is fair to say that I am running from the truth. I can't say I was never invited.
FIXED.
Questioninginla wrote:
fromtheotherside wrote:
Also if you don't accept my invitation, then you are just running from the truth. Don't say we never invited you.
Also I haven't accepted invitations to meet with ex-members to discuss control mechanisms and thought reform, so it is fair to say that I am running from the truth. I can't say I was never invited.
FIXED.
Interpersonal attribution- blame it on others. common disorders of Exmembers.
Emil will still probably say we never answered, in the hopes that they can decieve someone new who has not heard these replies of ours.
Emil has a track record of doing this with other debates if you read the archives. It doesn't matter if you have 5+, 10+ or even 15+ pages in a thread already attempting to explain things.
We have offered a solution to Emil's suggestions, and we have not run away, they simply just don't like our answer.
FTOS is right. Don't say we didn't invite you. Don't imply we are the ones who are running away, it is you who does not want to come.
Questioninginla
You sure do like to make a lot of assumptions about people, are all of your arguments based on such wild guesses?
Or do you just call everyone you don't agree with brainwashed?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.