- CreatorTopic
- August 15, 2013 at 11:08 PM#7390ScubaParticipant
Here is a link that says that Ahnsahnghong was baptized in 1952. It's his baptism record from the Seventh day Adventist church. It shows that he was baptized in 1952 and was expulsed from the church in 1962.
I'm sure the members would say that the Seventh day Adventist church is lying, but really what need do they have to lie? And also, he was expulsed in 1962, he didn't leave by his own will. Check this out! It's in Korean, if you don't speak korean just use Google Translate
- August 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM #64128
Jesus of NazarethParticipantThere goes that King David nonsense. As if it wasn't all ready done. The nail in the coffin, LOL. Good.
P.S. It's 1954 NOT 52. Stained told me about this weeks ago.
August 16, 2013 at 12:10 AM #28408
Jesus of NazarethParticipantThere goes that King David nonsense. As if it wasn't all ready done. The nail in the coffin, LOL. Good.
P.S. It's 1954 NOT 52. Stained told me about this weeks ago.
August 16, 2013 at 1:03 AM #64129
PeacefulSpeaksParticipantWord? The translation is weird, and I don't really know how to read that site…a bit confusing.
August 16, 2013 at 1:03 AM #28409
PeacefulSpeaksParticipantWord? The translation is weird, and I don't really know how to read that site…a bit confusing.
August 16, 2013 at 1:50 AM #64130
DisturbedParticipantOooooooh it was hard sitting around waiting for this info to come out!!!!!
August 16, 2013 at 1:50 AM #28410
DisturbedParticipantOooooooh it was hard sitting around waiting for this info to come out!!!!!
August 16, 2013 at 3:39 AM #28411
StainedParticipantDisturbed wrote:
Oooooooh it was hard sitting around waiting for this info to come out!!!!!
G-14 Officially De-Classified. /; u )
August 16, 2013 at 3:39 AM #64131
StainedParticipantDisturbed wrote:
Oooooooh it was hard sitting around waiting for this info to come out!!!!!
G-14 Officially De-Classified. /; u )
August 16, 2013 at 11:05 AM #28353
LoveParticipantGood Scuba, But while translating the page from google translation is not 100% so let us know the fact of Ahn Shang Hong Baptism.
August 16, 2013 at 11:05 AM #64132
LoveParticipantGood Scuba, But while translating the page from google translation is not 100% so let us know the fact of Ahn Shang Hong Baptism.
August 16, 2013 at 7:54 PM #64133
DisturbedParticipantWait for it…wait for it…COUNTER MEASURES! LOL…you know according to WMSCOG everyone else is lying. If this is in fact Ash's true baptism record 1954 not 1948 as the church claims, they will be exposed as frauds! Out the door goes King David, Fig Tree and anything else they claim Ash has fulfilled Bible scripture. Ash is NOT the christ. Even his children put on his tomb that he was Elijah, not Christ, not God. I hear the sound of the church walls collapsing and members fleeing!
August 16, 2013 at 7:54 PM #28361
DisturbedParticipantWait for it…wait for it…COUNTER MEASURES! LOL…you know according to WMSCOG everyone else is lying. If this is in fact Ash's true baptism record 1954 not 1948 as the church claims, they will be exposed as frauds! Out the door goes King David, Fig Tree and anything else they claim Ash has fulfilled Bible scripture. Ash is NOT the christ. Even his children put on his tomb that he was Elijah, not Christ, not God. I hear the sound of the church walls collapsing and members fleeing!
August 16, 2013 at 11:35 PM #28362
Jesus of NazarethParticipantDisturbed wrote:
Wait for it…wait for it…COUNTER MEASURES! LOL…you know according to WMSCOG everyone else is lying. If this is in fact Ash's true baptism record 1954 not 1948 as the church claims, they will be exposed as frauds! Out the door goes King David, Fig Tree and anything else they claim Ash has fulfilled Bible scripture. Ash is NOT the christ. Even his children put on his tomb that he was Elijah, not Christ, not God. I hear the sound of the church walls collapsing and members fleeing!
How sweet the sound. Stained, what can I say, you were right again….How do you do it all mighty one, how ? I am not worthy to ask such a question, I know this.
August 16, 2013 at 11:35 PM #64134
Jesus of NazarethParticipantDisturbed wrote:
Wait for it…wait for it…COUNTER MEASURES! LOL…you know according to WMSCOG everyone else is lying. If this is in fact Ash's true baptism record 1954 not 1948 as the church claims, they will be exposed as frauds! Out the door goes King David, Fig Tree and anything else they claim Ash has fulfilled Bible scripture. Ash is NOT the christ. Even his children put on his tomb that he was Elijah, not Christ, not God. I hear the sound of the church walls collapsing and members fleeing!
How sweet the sound. Stained, what can I say, you were right again….How do you do it all mighty one, how ? I am not worthy to ask such a question, I know this.
August 17, 2013 at 1:52 AM #28350
Ram KoiralaParticipantThis is great job and key point but please translate the whole document in English and put in home page of examining site. It will be better and helpful to all the members of wmscog. When I read this message in the forum I was surprise that ahn Shang hong was baptise in the year 1954. And please find out it is 100/ percent true. Mention the source also.
August 17, 2013 at 1:52 AM #64135
Ram KoiralaParticipantThis is great job and key point but please translate the whole document in English and put in home page of examining site. It will be better and helpful to all the members of wmscog. When I read this message in the forum I was surprise that ahn Shang hong was baptise in the year 1954. And please find out it is 100/ percent true. Mention the source also.
August 26, 2013 at 6:35 AM #26102
DisturbedParticipantI just wanted to bring this topic to the top. Has anyone had any conversations with current members about this baptism record information? I’m curious to know what the church says about this evidence. I already know their standard message, that its a lie, fabricated, whatever.
August 26, 2013 at 6:35 AM #64136
DisturbedParticipantI just wanted to bring this topic to the top. Has anyone had any conversations with current members about this baptism record information? I’m curious to know what the church says about this evidence. I already know their standard message, that its a lie, fabricated, whatever.
August 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM #25212
AnonymousInactiveI have brought this up with my loved one. At first I was asked how did I know the pictures were true pictures and not photoshopped. I responded with saying I was working of the validation of the pictures. In a later conversation, I asked again about this and was told a conversation with the leaders stated that ASH had more than one bible he made notes in and the one with all of his correct information was handed to Mother as evidenced by a photo taken in the late 70's-early 80's of him handing her a book. This photo was shown to members during a convention in Pasadena, CA earlier this year. This book is now on display in Korea as witnessed by others who have visited there. I asked my loved one where they sure this photo was not photoshopped or fake. The response was they couldn't confirm that only that they h ad seen this photo during the convention and believed it to be authentic. Once again……..LIES!!!!!!!!! When will these members open their minds?
August 26, 2013 at 12:06 PM #64137
AnonymousInactiveI have brought this up with my loved one. At first I was asked how did I know the pictures were true pictures and not photoshopped. I responded with saying I was working of the validation of the pictures. In a later conversation, I asked again about this and was told a conversation with the leaders stated that ASH had more than one bible he made notes in and the one with all of his correct information was handed to Mother as evidenced by a photo taken in the late 70's-early 80's of him handing her a book. This photo was shown to members during a convention in Pasadena, CA earlier this year. This book is now on display in Korea as witnessed by others who have visited there. I asked my loved one where they sure this photo was not photoshopped or fake. The response was they couldn't confirm that only that they h ad seen this photo during the convention and believed it to be authentic. Once again……..LIES!!!!!!!!! When will these members open their minds?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.