- CreatorTopic
- January 25, 2013 at 11:10 PM#7095Moved-CommentParticipant
This comment was originally posted on "The WMSCOG's Failed Predictions of 1988, 1999, and 2012. What Will They Predict Next?" on 11/28/12 in reply to Jeff.
Really?? says:
What truth ??? I guess anyone can write anything on the internet about anybody and everyone believes.
1) Does everyone know that this website is being paid to slander the WMSCOG?
sound like they like money 🙂
2) Guess who paying this website ? I hope is not another church ? oh my no way!!! , I thought they would do this because they love God
3) And really please think about Jesus clearly talk about the end many times ?
And even Paul talked about the end ? the whole bible talks about it ?
4) is it not a little presumptuous to use a Facebook snap shot that says 2012 and write a whole page about it ?LOL
But really God told us that he can come anything time ,2000000,3000000 and now. It is in Matthew 24 if your wondering. Did he not say "be ready" ? Why are you going against the teaching of Christ ? If The WMScog says "we should be ready " this site says" look their talking about the End" lol
Titus 1:15 – "To the pure, all thing a pure, but to those who are corrupted and do not believe , nothing is pure . They claim to know God ,but by their actions they deny him "
Watch this site say anyone can use that verse? 🙂 But anyway Christ said "be ready" so it can never be wrong to say that 🙂
- January 26, 2013 at 12:35 AM #51727
EmilyParticipantReally??,
Do you have any proof that the website admin is being paid to run this website? Is this something you heard from someone at your local wms location?
Obviously, you didn't read the entire article. It is not about the one Facebook post as you claim.
Also, what does "being ready" for Jesus to return, have to do with a bunch of false doomsday predictions made by the wms? Nothing.
January 26, 2013 at 12:41 AM #51728
JoshuaParticipantIm not going to go into this in detail but what is this ____? I'm throwing the BS flag once again on the WMSCOG. Get real or go home!
January 26, 2013 at 12:45 AM #51729
Sarah2013ParticipantTotal rubbish.
January 26, 2013 at 3:08 AM #51730
adminKeymasterWhat truth ??? I guess anyone can write anything on the internet about anybody and everyone believes. 1) Does everyone know that this website is being paid to slander the WMSCOG?
sound like they like money 🙂no one gets paid to run this web site. on the contrary, they get sued for it. what "slander" would you be referring to? when someone disagrees with you and points out your mistakes it's called criticism–which is constitutionally protected free speech here in the US.
2) Guess who paying this website ? I hope is not another church ? oh my no way!!! , I thought they would do this because they love God
again, no one gets paid here. the web site is indeed set up out of love for Jesus Christ, which is clearly explained on the Mission page: https://www.examiningthewmscog.com/archives/mission/
where do you hear such rubbish anyway?
January 26, 2013 at 5:27 AM #51731
Abhigail DelemaParticipantat least web site is not run by people with their offerings or telling them to sell their gold & houses,
January 26, 2013 at 5:32 AM #51732
Sarah2013ParticipantComplete rubbish.
January 28, 2013 at 12:39 AM #51733
fromtheothersideParticipantHe has point why don't you show you all your bank account records and also your addresse and lease agreement if you live in an apartment or if it's a home show us the value and all business records, prove it if its not false. So what, your words are "trusted" and ours is not, a little B.S isn't it? ^^
January 28, 2013 at 12:57 AM #51734
fromtheothersideParticipantAlso how are you paying for the legal fees? Lawyers in the U.S aren't cheap… If you are truthfull PROVE IT!
January 28, 2013 at 1:54 AM #51735
EmilyParticipantfromtheotherside wrote:
He has point why don't you show you all your bank account records and also your addresse and lease agreement if you live in an apartment or if it's a home show us the value and all business records, prove it if its not false. So what, your words are "trusted" and ours is not, a little B.S isn't it? ^^
First of all, if "Really??" wants to make the accusation that the admin is being paid to run the site, then he/she has the burden to prove it. He/She hasn't provided any proof.
fromtheotherside wrote:
Also how are you paying for the legal fees? Lawyers in the U.S aren't cheap… If you are truthfull PROVE IT!
I guess you aren't posting from the US so maybe you don't know that it doesn't work that way here. That's none of your business and has no bearing on whether the admin is truthful or not.
January 28, 2013 at 2:36 AM #51736
fromtheothersideParticipantOh really, bunch of hypocrites. (you gonna erase this to admin??^^ I notice you guys are the ones who delete comments, information control i c, wait do I smell…. CULT?) Your whole site is filled with accusations but no proof. Stop filling peoples thoughts with lies and deceit. You guys hold hands with liars and people who only want monetary gain. So you admin are being paid to do this. Prove you are not! Or we will take it you are.
O it's none of our business huh? It is when you are hurting our family and friends and loved ones! Spreading hatred and lies. Promoting prejudice amongst God loving people. It is our business. And we won't stop until you are revealed for who you really are.
Money makes you lie doesn't it?
January 28, 2013 at 2:38 AM #51737
gennyParticipantEmily wrote:
First of all, if "Really??" wants to make the accusation that the admin is being paid to run the site, then he/she has the burden to prove it. He/She hasn't provided any proof.
Agreed. "Really?" should have at least some kind of supportive evidence for such a claim.
fromtheotherside wrote:
Also how are you paying for the legal fees? Lawyers in the U.S aren't cheap… If you are truthfull PROVE IT!
I guess you aren't posting from the US so maybe you don't know that it doesn't work that way here. That's none of your business and has no bearing on whether the admin is truthful or not.
That's right, Emily.
And fromtheotherside, if you'd like to go that route… Should we ask how the WMSCOG is paying for their legal fees?
January 28, 2013 at 4:32 AM #51738
adminKeymasterThanks for writing in from South Korea fromtheotherside. Glad to have you here.
Since you're new, please read the forum rules for posting. All participants must follow the rules.
Firstly, even if someone was being paid to run this site, what would that prove? Ignoring the facts and attacking the person presenting them is an ad-hominem. You should debate the facts presented (see rule #2).
fromtheotherside wrote:
I notice you guys are the ones who delete comments,
Not sure what you mean by this. Are you referring to content which violates the forum rules? Or were maybe some of your comments accidentally caught by the spam filter?
Thanks for joining in the debate, and we look forward to having you participate respectfully in the future.
January 28, 2013 at 5:04 AM #51739
angelikkeprParticipantIt is so sad to see how the WMSCOG keep lying and inventing excuses to their members… A fake Empire is shaking!!!
January 28, 2013 at 5:33 AM #51740
fromtheothersideParticipantRespectfully, does that include making crude jokes about our God on the forum? Or are just implying respect YOUR members? So where does the "Respectfully" come into play for you guys? Or is it to only protect the broken hearts of Church of God dropouts? <you gonna delete this cuz trust me Ive seen worse from your side that doesn't get deleted.
If you were being paid to run this site, most likely that would be from a source that has animosity or ill will towards the church of God, also most likely the evidence that you would upload on this site would be unreliable. There is difference of credibility dependant upon the agenda and source.
January 28, 2013 at 5:40 AM #51741
EmilyParticipantfromtheotherside wrote:
Respectfully, does that include making crude jokes about our God on the forum? Or are just implying respect YOUR members? So where does the "Respectfully" come into play for you guys? Or is it to only protect the broken hearts of Church of God dropouts? <you gonna delete this cuz trust me Ive seen worse from your side that doesn't get deleted.
If you were being paid to run this site, most likely that would be from a source that has animosity or ill will towards the church of God, also most likely the evidence that you would upload on this site would be unreliable. There is difference of credibility dependant upon the agenda and source.
I would like to see you actually refute something on the site.
Also, how much research did you do regarding the claims that the WMS makes? How do you if the information the WMS presents to you is reliable?
It has already been made clear that the WMS has twisted historical facts and dates in order to support some of the studies. What motivation would the WMS have to do that?
January 28, 2013 at 5:51 AM #51742
fromtheothersideParticipantLolz, I don't that's the topic right now Emily. Stick to the topic.
January 28, 2013 at 5:55 AM #51743
EmilyParticipantfromtheotherside wrote:
Lolz, I don't that's the topic right now Emily. Stick to the topic.
Oh it isn't?
fromtheotherside wrote:
Your whole site is filled with accusations but no proof. Stop filling peoples thoughts with lies and deceit.
So can you actually refute something that you believe is an accusation? Since you said that the "whole site" is full of them.
January 28, 2013 at 6:03 AM #51744
adminKeymasterfromtheotherside wrote:
Respectfully, does that include making crude jokes about our God on the forum? Or are just implying respect YOUR members? So where does the "Respectfully" come into play for you guys? Or is it to only protect the broken hearts of Church of God dropouts? <you gonna delete this cuz trust me Ive seen worse from your side that doesn't get deleted.
if there are rule violations, then please report them as described here. you may also PM the link.
January 28, 2013 at 6:09 AM #51745
fromtheothersideParticipantadmin wrote:
Thanks for writing in from South Korea fromtheotherside. Glad to have you here. Since you're new, please read the forum rules for posting. All participants must follow the rules.
Firstly, even if someone was being paid to run this site, what would that prove? Ignoring the facts and attacking the person presenting them is an ad-hominem. You should debate the facts presented (see rule #2)
You guys us this no 'ad-hominem' but the fact of the matter is, if in fact admin recieves or recieved compensation for his efforts on this site then credibility would become an issue. Because most likely his source for which he got most of his so called -evidence- would be the same source who compensates him. So is this a an issue I do believe so. So untill he can prove credibility, everything on this site is circumstantial. You guys have burden of proof.
January 28, 2013 at 6:38 AM #51746
SimonParticipantsorry but even if he is paid to lie the information he posts is all verifiable on its own. I disagree with a tonne said by the admin but when it comes to a lot of noninterpretive stuff it’s corroborated by wmscog publications the bible and any Encyclopaedia or history book..
no matter how credible someone is facts are facts.
“You must accept the truth from whatever source it comes.” ― Maimonides
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.