Second Lawsuit Against Former WMSCOG Member Gets Thrown Out

On February 9th, 2015, a New Jersey Superior Court judge dismissed (with prejudice) a lawsuit filed by the World Mission Society Church of God in Ridgewood against former member Michele Colón.  The lawsuit filed by the WMSCOG back in July of 2012 alleged defamation among other causes of action.  After over two and half years of pre-trial litigation, the Court ruled that online statements allegedly made by Ms. Colón that described the WMSCOG as a “cult” that uses “mind control” and “destroys families”, are opinions and are therefore protected by the First Amendment (more info here).  The Court found that the WMSCOG is a public figure which increases First Amendment protection of WMSCOG critics.  The Court also found that “whether a specific religious organization is akin to a cult, is a matter of public concern”, which raises Firs Amendment protection of critics of any cult.

In the seventeen page opinion written by the Court, the judge also cites the WMSCOG’s inability to prove damages and noncompliance with court orders to produce relevant financial documents.  It was also noted by the judge that the WMSCOG’s net income increased from 1.8 Million in 2009 to over 3.6 Million in 2012, a period in which the WMSCOG claimed to have lost 5 million in revenue (See page 23 of the original complaint filed in this case).

If you are a current member of the WMSCOG, ask yourself, shouldn’t the mother god have known that this case would be thrown out by the Court?


You might also like
  1. T.H. says

    What a cool thing to have happened! Our justice system backed up the little guy so to speak. Way to stick it out Michelle. I hope you follow this up with a multi-million dollar lawsuit against them.

  2. Mountainmom says

    Most cults leave a negative “paper trail” of law suits that they have filed against anyone who speaks out. It’s one of the ways you can tell if a group is a “church” or a cult.

    Does God have to sue people? And how did “Mother” not know and inform her leadership that they would lose? I thought they have a direct phone line to God. Not so, apparently.

  3. genny says

    Thank you for posting this, and for hanging in there through the long legal process. The “Failure to Prove Damages” part (starting on page 12) especially riveting for me.

    I also think it’s interesting that on one hand the wmscog will talk about how they are growing, yet on the other hand here talk about how the critical websites are hurting their membership and offering count.

Leave A Reply

Please be aware that the WMSCOG reads this website. Unless necessary, please refrain from adding any information that they can use to identify you or your family in the comments.

Your email address will not be published.