- Topic
There’s a lot of pressure placed on members of the WMSCOG to recognize the supposed new name of Christ. If their god the mother is so important why don’t they recognize her name? By the way, she’s been called by a couple different names over the years. Which ones the real one?
No I am not mixed up I said they were BETWEEN 31-37 I realize Seoul is technically.27 degrees north of Patmos but the coordinates are not exact anyways. I assume Google probably goes from dead centre therefore that is still pretty close. Further Ahnsahnghong was born and baptized in Busan which IS within those coordinates Mother was born near Seoul and it is the capital which is why I included it.
This is interesting but in a lighter vein. I just saw this thread. Simon said:
Simon wrote:
Ah probably about the East or The Seal of God. Patmos Jerusalem and South Korea all being on the same longitudinal line.
So I took the co-ordinates that were shown in this thread for Patmos and Jerusalem. Patmos and Jerusalem are not on the same latitude. Jerusalem is considerably south of Patmos. It does happen to be east of Patmos to an even greater degree.
I did a bit of calculation to see where a straight line drawn from Patmos through Jerusalem would lead toward. At the longitude of Seoul (127 east), the straight line I modeled goes through the Gibson Desert in Western Australia. ๐
Continuing the straight line further, I find it goes through Melbourne.
But before all that, the line passes pretty close to Riyadh in Saudi Arabia.
Who gives a flying p/h/u/c/k where either one of them was born. They're both nothing they're both nobody they both mean nothing. He spent a great deal of his life in Japan, the country that is too feminine for the savior to have come from. Stained knows all.
Stained wrote:
Who gives a flying p/h/u/c/k where either one of them was born. They're both nothing they're both nobody they both mean nothing. He spent a great deal of his life in Japan, the country that is too feminine for the savior to have come from. Stained knows all.
Hey tracing that straight line backward takes us straight through Greenland. Why don't we just send them there?
but then this isn't east anymore just saying lol
Yes tracing back to Greenland is certainly going westward. However, we must be clear that the Earth is a globe and you would have got to Greenland by going eastward as well. You would have gone through Saudi Arabia, the Indian Ocean, Australia and up the other side, all the way across and heading down the globe again via Greenland, Edinburgh, Antwerp (Belgium), Zurich, Stuttgart, Tirana (Albania) and back to Patmos. ๐
Going to austrailia isn't going east either
Simon wrote:
Going to austrailia isn't going east either
Seriously Simon? Where do you think Australia is?
This whole thing started when I saw it mentioned that Patmos, Jerusalem and Korea are on one horizontal line. Now Jerusalem is South-East of Patmos. So if you start from Patmos towards Jerusalem in a straight line and keep going South-East in the exact same direction, you will get to Melbourne. Check it out.
that is a major over simplification of the claim.
The new name is rubbish.
Absolutely, Sarah. Pure rubbish as far as Ahnsahnghong is concerned, anyway.
Simon wrote:
that is a major over simplification of the claim.
Rather, the straight horizontal line on which Patmos, Jerusalem and Korea lie is a non-existent fantasy. Not sure if that is their claim but it is the claim I believe you made on their behalf a year ago.
Not really… more like a scatter plot
^ That way you could keep joining dots between any two places in the world and each would be straight lines. I guess members just lap up everything without question.
well it wouldn't work with ANY two
There is no new name. Even if one existed it is not relevant.
Sarah2013 wrote:
There is no new name. Even if one existed it is not relevant.
If Jesus had a new name why wouldn't it be relevant?
The new name is that of our beloved father, STAINED. All hail, for he knows all, sees all, he is all powerful, he is the inside track, bless him.
That kind of statement is exactly what WMSCOG loves pointing out it's just as blasphemous as theirs
Simon wrote:
Sarah2013 wrote:
There is no new name. Even if one existed it is not relevant.
If Jesus had a new name why wouldn't it be relevant?
I try to stay out of the heavy religious debates but in this case I'm gonna go out on a limb and say, if Jesus changed his name it would probably be a pretty big deal
.
Jesus of Nazareth wrote:
The new name is that of our beloved father, STAINED. All hail, for he knows all, sees all, he is all powerful, he is the inside track, bless him.
Simon wrote:
That kind of statement is exactly what WMSCOG loves pointing out it's just as blasphemous as theirs
SIMON, I'm going out on a limb again, PLEASE tell me you know when we write about Stained being like god, it's a parody. You know, like we are making a joke to prove a point. All the ridiculous stuff we write directly relates to the ridiculous stuff they do. So please don't call our brother J of N a blasphemer. I think you need to count more actuallys (which is like them telling you to keep studying) I'll translate the stuff for you
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.