Tagged: wmscog
- CreatorTopic
- March 9, 2014 at 3:38 PM#7566SmurfParticipant
According to the WMS when you turn the Roman letters from the pope's title into numerals, you get a sum of 666. Right.
So if we use the same logic, we uncover who the real beast is!
Take a look. It's like straight from the "Evidence" book.
- March 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM #66543
JoshuaParticipantHi Floyd, I know this is just a piece of humor and believe me I love humor. You should check out the lets add a little humor section I created in our forum over a year ago. It's pretty funny overall.
On a different note; Unless you use some governmental fuzzy math the pope's title or hat doesn't add up to 666. If you look up Ellen G. White, the numbers is her name seems to add up to 666. Many of the WMSCOG's studies come from the teachings of Ellen G. White. Talk about a wolf in sheeps clothes. Research people. Do some research. It's almost scary what you'll find especially if you're mixed up in something like this.
March 9, 2014 at 11:38 PM #66544
SmurfParticipanthttp://www.pacinst.com/nslaw/chapter3/666.jpg
That's the math right here.
I don't know who originally came up with it, but I see it being used as the main method to determine the identity of the beast, which is ridiculous!!
God would never use gematria for His purposes!
Relying on ancient babylonian numerology to help you interpret the Bible is way worse than wearing a cross, members of the cult should know this.
Yet very few of them are aware of it.
March 9, 2014 at 11:53 PM #66545
JoshuaParticipantI'm with you on this! I appreciate it when others do research and prove the truth. This is the problem with most of the members of the WMSCOG. They didn't do any research before they gave their souls to this doctrine. It's the biggest problem that the members of this group have. They have bought the lies that have been told to them as the "truth" without researching or "testing the spirits" as it were.
March 10, 2014 at 6:29 AM #66546
TravisParticipantJoshua wrote:
I'm with you on this! I appreciate it when others do research and prove the truth. This is the problem with most of the members of the WMSCOG. They didn't do any research before they gave their souls to this doctrine. It's the biggest problem that the members of this group have. They have bought the lies that have been told to them as the "truth" without researching or "testing the spirits" as it were.
I concur with you Joshua, NOT doing any research before deciding to drink the kool aid is the biggest mistake new members make. They go with empty brains and empty hearts. It's why they couldn't convince me .. I spent three months going on and off to take studies and at the end of each study the guy asked me "are you ready to get baptized?" but my answer was always that I had to critically analyze the information and weight my options. His comeback answer was always "You will begin to understand everything once you get baptized, because you will accept Christ Ash, and the holy spirit will enter you." I felt his persistence and impatience; that was my first hint …
March 10, 2014 at 7:10 AM #66547
SimonParticipantgematria isn’t Babylonian also it’s the bible that says it’s gematria not man
Doesn’tmakeitthe popethough
March 10, 2014 at 3:39 PM #66548
OmerParticipantWMS loves to deceit people every way possible. Also, Gematria cannot be applied upon since we have the translation of the bible.
March 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM #66549
SimonParticipanthuh
March 10, 2014 at 4:43 PM #66550
Love'n HoneyParticipantI heard that the original number wasn't 666. That's it was 668 or something like that. I'm going to look into it.
March 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM #66551
Love'n HoneyParticipanthttp://www.escapeallthesethings.com/666-616-number-mark-of-the-beast.htm
The WMSCOG is wrong. Prince Charles is the beast, not the Pope!
March 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM #66552
SmurfParticipantI've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.
Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif
And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.
March 10, 2014 at 5:01 PM #66553
Love'n HoneyParticipanthttp://biblehub.com/text/revelation/13-18.htm
Here it says six hundred sixty six.
March 10, 2014 at 5:15 PM #66554
SmurfParticipantThe NIV uses the GNT Morph, while KJV uses Textus Receptus, which are probably different versions of the greek text, but I'm no scholar.
http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rev&c=13&t=KJV#s=t_conc_1180018
March 10, 2014 at 6:16 PM #66555
ChurchDestroyer101Participantfloyd rose wrote:
http://www.pacinst.com/nslaw/chapter3/666.jpg
That's the math right here.
I don't know who originally came up with it, but I see it being used as the main method to determine the identity of the beast, which is ridiculous!!
God would never use gematria for His purposes!
Relying on ancient babylonian numerology to help you interpret the Bible is way worse than wearing a cross, members of the cult should know this.
Yet very few of them are aware of it.
wow….
March 11, 2014 at 4:29 AM #66556
emilParticipantfloyd rose wrote:
I've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.
Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif
And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.
Could that mean Cheol, Xahng and Sahnghong?
March 11, 2014 at 5:35 AM #66557
Jesus of NazarethParticipantfloyd rose wrote:
According to the WMS when you turn the Roman letters from the pope's title into numerals, you get a sum of 666. Right.
So if we use the same logic, we uncover who the real beast is!
Take a look. It's like straight from the "Evidence" book.
That's a U in vicarius not a V. The letter U has no roman numerical value. Thus it's bulls/h/i/t.
March 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM #66558
Love'n HoneyParticipantemil wrote:
floyd rose wrote:
I've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.
Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif
And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.
Could that mean Cheol, Xahng and Sahnghong?
LOL! Hm….
March 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM #66559
SimonParticipantNo imposter u/v have the same Roman numeral value
March 15, 2014 at 4:35 AM #66560
Jesus of NazarethParticipantSimon wrote:
No imposter u/v have the same Roman numeral value
WTF you mean "imposter" ? U is not a Roman Numeral thus vicarius stuff is just more Bulls/h/i/t/.
March 15, 2014 at 7:37 AM #66561
SimonParticipantAgain you are wrong
March 17, 2014 at 3:55 PM #66562
Love'n HoneyParticipant
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.