VICARIUS FILII DEI

Tagged: 

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7566
    Smurf
    Participant

    According to the WMS when you turn the Roman letters from the pope's title into numerals, you get a sum of 666. Right.

    So if we use the same logic, we uncover who the real beast is!

    Take a look. It's like straight from the "Evidence" book.

    http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2342608/Barney/

  • #66543

    Joshua
    Participant

    Hi Floyd, I know this is just a piece of humor and believe me I love humor. You should check out the lets add a little humor section I created in our forum over a year ago. It's pretty funny overall.

    On a different note; Unless you use some governmental fuzzy math the pope's title or hat doesn't add up to 666. If you look up Ellen G. White, the numbers is her name seems to add up to 666. Many of the WMSCOG's studies come from the teachings of Ellen G. White. Talk about a wolf in sheeps clothes. Research people. Do some research. It's almost scary what you'll find especially if you're mixed up in something like this.

    #66544

    Smurf
    Participant

    http://www.pacinst.com/nslaw/chapter3/666.jpg

    That's the math right here.

    I don't know who originally came up with it, but I see it being used as the main method to determine the identity of the beast, which is ridiculous!!

    God would never use gematria for His purposes!

    Relying on ancient babylonian numerology to help you interpret the Bible is way worse than wearing a cross, members of the cult should know this.

    Yet very few of them are aware of it.

    #66545

    Joshua
    Participant

    I'm with you on this! I appreciate it when others do research and prove the truth. This is the problem with most of the members of the WMSCOG. They didn't do any research before they gave their souls to this doctrine. It's the biggest problem that the members of this group have. They have bought the lies that have been told to them as the "truth" without researching or "testing the spirits" as it were.

    #66546

    Travis
    Participant

    Joshua wrote:

    I'm with you on this! I appreciate it when others do research and prove the truth. This is the problem with most of the members of the WMSCOG. They didn't do any research before they gave their souls to this doctrine. It's the biggest problem that the members of this group have. They have bought the lies that have been told to them as the "truth" without researching or "testing the spirits" as it were.

    I concur with you Joshua, NOT doing any research before deciding to drink the kool aid is the biggest mistake new members make. They go with empty brains and empty hearts. It's why they couldn't convince me .. I spent three months going on and off to take studies and at the end of each study the guy asked me "are you ready to get baptized?" but my answer was always that I had to critically analyze the information and weight my options. His comeback answer was always "You will begin to understand everything once you get baptized, because you will accept Christ Ash, and the holy spirit will enter you." I felt his persistence and impatience; that was my first hint … 

    #66547

    Simon
    Participant

    gematria isn’t Babylonian also it’s the bible that says it’s gematria not man

    Doesn’tmakeitthe popethough

    #66548

    Omer
    Participant

    WMS loves to deceit people every way possible. Also, Gematria cannot be applied upon since we have the translation of the bible.

    #66549

    Simon
    Participant

    huh

    #66550

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    I heard that the original number wasn't 666. That's it was 668 or something like that. I'm going to look into it.

    #66551

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    http://www.escapeallthesethings.com/666-616-number-mark-of-the-beast.htm

    The WMSCOG is wrong. Prince Charles is the beast, not the Pope!

    #66552

    Smurf
    Participant

    I've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.

    Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif

    And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.

    #66553

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    http://biblehub.com/text/revelation/13-18.htm

    Here it says six hundred sixty six.

    #66554

    Smurf
    Participant

    The NIV uses the GNT Morph, while KJV uses Textus Receptus, which are probably different versions of the greek text, but I'm no scholar.

     

    http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rev&c=13&t=KJV#s=t_conc_1180018

    #66555

    ChurchDestroyer101
    Participant

    floyd rose wrote:

    http://www.pacinst.com/nslaw/chapter3/666.jpg

    That's the math right here.

    I don't know who originally came up with it, but I see it being used as the main method to determine the identity of the beast, which is ridiculous!!

    God would never use gematria for His purposes!

    Relying on ancient babylonian numerology to help you interpret the Bible is way worse than wearing a cross, members of the cult should know this.

    Yet very few of them are aware of it.

    wow….

    #66556

    emil
    Participant

    floyd rose wrote:

    I've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.

    Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif

    And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.

    Could that mean Cheol, Xahng and Sahnghong?

    #66557

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    floyd rose wrote:

    According to the WMS when you turn the Roman letters from the pope's title into numerals, you get a sum of 666. Right.

    So if we use the same logic, we uncover who the real beast is!

    Take a look. It's like straight from the "Evidence" book.

    http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2342608/Barney/

     That's a U in vicarius not a V.  The letter U has no roman numerical value.  Thus it's bulls/h/i/t. 

    #66558

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    emil wrote:

    floyd rose wrote:

    I've heard that too. However the greek letters (letters, not numbers, mind you) in the NT are chi, xi and sigma. There's nothing to interpret.

    Chi is 600; Xi is 60 and Sigma is always 6. http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/collections/papyrus/k12/images/numbers2.gif

    And not like three sixes which is a common misconception.

    Could that mean Cheol, Xahng and Sahnghong?

     LOL! Hm….

    #66559

    Simon
    Participant

    No imposter u/v have the same Roman numeral value

    #66560

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    Simon wrote:

    No imposter u/v have the same Roman numeral value

     WTF you mean "imposter" ?  U is not a Roman Numeral thus vicarius stuff is just more Bulls/h/i/t/.

    #66561

    Simon
    Participant

    Again you are wrong

    #66562

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    Jesus of Nazareth wrote:

    Simon wrote:

    No imposter u/v have the same Roman numeral value

     WTF you mean "imposter" ?  U is not a Roman Numeral thus vicarius stuff is just more Bulls/h/i/t/.

     

     I think he means you're not really Jesus of Nazareth.

Viewing 20 replies - 1 through 20 (of 66 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.