[Sarah2013]

Is Wmscog speaking of itself when it talks about the beast and the harlot? If not, then who?

[Sarah2013]

[Sarah2013]

Thanks!

[emil]

Yeah thanks Simon. Genny has a very well-researched 6 or 7 part rebuttal of their interpretation of the pope being the antichrist.

[Love'n Honey]

Well, then I'll just shut up..

[emil]

renita.payno wrote:

Well, then I'll just shut up..

Sorry. What was that for? Did I say something offensive?

[genny]

renita.payno wrote:

Well, then I'll just shut up..

No, go for it… 🙂  I'm sure you can add some good stuff to the topic.  I only researched their interpretation of the antichrist (beast from the sea).

[Simon]

It's very complex a lot of people get the beast are harlot mixed around and confused etc

[emil]

Whichever way you look at it, the two are separate entities. So any interpretation that claims they both point to the same entity is false.

[Simon]

All interpretations I have ever heard make that claim

[Love'n Honey]

The WMSCOG says the beast from the sea is the Catholic church. The harlot/prostitute is the Pope. The beast with 10 horns in Dan is Rome. I had to pause and rewind the video a few times. The number of the beast out of the sea is 666 which they say is the name of the pope with roman numerals. But the pope is the prostitute.

Ha.. Now I see the contradiction.

Plus, the prostitute can't be a person, it has to be a church because of their interpretation of  "woman" and "church". The beast from the sea has to be the Pope. The harlot has to be the Roman Catholic Church. But the harlot is clothed in scarlet and holds a gold cup which describes the Pope.. So many knots and loose ends. Could the second beast who exercised the power of the 1st beast be Napolean?

[Simon]

well don't forget the harlot is the Roman Catholic Church, all churches but WMSCOG, Um Sooin, the Pope ….