Publishing Month of Interpretation on the New Jerusalem and the Issue of the Head Covering of Bride?

Tagged: ,

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7437
    PeacefulSpeaks
    Participant

    Hello All! Smile

    Does anyone know what month the "Interpretation on the New Jerusalem…" was published?  I have tried to search on the ncpcog website, but I can't find anything.  I want to know because as you all know, we were told that Ahnsahnghong revealed "Mother" in 1984 during Passover.  However, this book was published IN 1984.  It 100% doesn't make sense for Ahnsahnghong to reveal "Mother" in the same year that he speaks against the idea of a Mother God.  I also think it would be quite awesome if he published this after 1984's Passover. Wouldn't that be a tell-tale sign for current members? hmmm…

    <table cellpadding=”0″ class=”cf hr”>

    <tbody>

    <tr>

    <td class=”hw”>

     </td>

    <td>

     </td>

    </tr>

    </tbody>

    </table>

  • #63929

    Love'n Honey
    Participant

    emil wrote:

    A long time back, while my friend in the wmscog was still open to communication, I had asked her about this book. Her response was too funny. It was reminiscent of a literary character called Billy Bunter I used to enjoy reading about in my childhood. 

    She basically said that there is no such book it is only a rumour created to discredit the wmscog. She went on to say that he had a good reason for writing the book, which she had moments before declared did not exist. This was exactly the way I remember Billy Bunter reacted when he had been caught in a misadventure.

     A few members said the same thing to me. Explaining Ash had a reason for writing a book that didn't exist. What does this prove? Everything.

    #63930

    Hobbit
    Participant

    They criticize the ex members for taking the book out of context but they won’t give copies to the members to read it. The WM$COG will soon be shocked

    #63931

    Love
    Participant

    Before the church was divided in to two groups the book problem with new Jerusalem and women veil was published in the year 1980 & for the second time 1983. Ahn Shang Hong never said about god the mother. He never wrote about mother god. Zang Zil Zah was established by wmscog not by Ahn Shang Hong. If there was mother god then why did he republish the book while he was alive?. Well Ahn Shang Hong contribute his life as Christian but never mention about mother god he said mother god is delusion. So we can know who and what is WMSCOG.

    #63932

    Stained
    Participant

    From Stained's Greatest Hits: [Volume One]

    Behold, I will reveal pure truth to you, it has been given to you but not to them. 

    Pay close attention to the following video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNkkko4vlBs</font</font  

    That, my Subjects, is all you need to know about a Woman's Veil, I, Stained, have spoken. 

    #63933

    God my love
    Participant

    I recommend every one to study the book written by ahn Shang hong problem with new Jerusalem because all the meaning are perfect so wmscog cannot never denei the truth. There is no mother at all I am translating this book in my native language so that every one in my country could read it.

    #29775

    God my love
    Participant

    I recommend every one to study the book written by ahn Shang hong problem with new Jerusalem because all the meaning are perfect so wmscog cannot never denei the truth. There is no mother at all I am translating this book in my native language so that every one in my country could read it.

    #28405

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    Love wrote:

    Yes The Korean version of the book Problem with New Jerusalem and women Veil was first published 7/18/1980 and republished again 10/20/1983. Church says the book was publish once and later Ahn Shang Hong Collected it to all and cancelled. Good Question is, then why did they publish it again? This Question can't be answer by WMSCOG and they always lied about this book. Now every one can guess what is their intension.

     

     Lied ?  They never even acknowledged it's existence until they had no choice.  Then they came up with that stupid video saying that Umm and other chicks went into gods bookbag and stole his ideas.  Unbelievable b u l l s h i t. 

    #63934

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    Love wrote:

    Yes The Korean version of the book Problem with New Jerusalem and women Veil was first published 7/18/1980 and republished again 10/20/1983. Church says the book was publish once and later Ahn Shang Hong Collected it to all and cancelled. Good Question is, then why did they publish it again? This Question can't be answer by WMSCOG and they always lied about this book. Now every one can guess what is their intension.

     

     Lied ?  They never even acknowledged it's existence until they had no choice.  Then they came up with that stupid video saying that Umm and other chicks went into gods bookbag and stole his ideas.  Unbelievable b u l l s h i t. 

    #27901

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    Emily wrote:

    Here is the Moonie lecture on the "clouds mean flesh" argument here.  Sounds almost identical to the wms study that I did but you decide.  

     What a bunch of B U L L S H I T.  Arrogance permeates throughout.    

    #63935

    Jesus of Nazareth
    Participant

    Emily wrote:

    Here is the Moonie lecture on the "clouds mean flesh" argument here.  Sounds almost identical to the wms study that I did but you decide.  

     What a bunch of B U L L S H I T.  Arrogance permeates throughout.    

    #27745

    Ram Koirala
    Participant

    Thanks for Moonie lecture on the "clouds mean flesh" argument herebecause I didn't know that they copied other ideas. Arrogance permeates throughout.    

    #63936

    Ram Koirala
    Participant

    Thanks for Moonie lecture on the "clouds mean flesh" argument herebecause I didn't know that they copied other ideas. Arrogance permeates throughout.    

Viewing 12 replies - 41 through 52 (of 52 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.