- Topic
Hello All!
Does anyone know what month the "Interpretation on the New Jerusalem…" was published? I have tried to search on the ncpcog website, but I can't find anything. I want to know because as you all know, we were told that Ahnsahnghong revealed "Mother" in 1984 during Passover. However, this book was published IN 1984. It 100% doesn't make sense for Ahnsahnghong to reveal "Mother" in the same year that he speaks against the idea of a Mother God. I also think it would be quite awesome if he published this after 1984's Passover. Wouldn't that be a tell-tale sign for current members? hmmm…
<table cellpadding=”0″ class=”cf hr”>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class=”hw”>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
I'm glad to know the book was published & republished. Clearly Ash wanted to be clear on his stance about "god the mother" whether it was Um Sooin or any other woman. The idea is delusion and against the will of God.
I'm glad to know the book was published & republished. Clearly Ash wanted to be clear on his stance about "god the mother" whether it was Um Sooin or any other woman. The idea is delusion and against the will of God.
The brother that tried to take my picture acted like he didn't know what book I was talking about. I repeated the title several times and he said, 'Oh, the Green Book?' or 'Oh, the video Armor of God.' I hate when members play dumb. He later confessed he knew about the book then wanted to know where I read it. To his 'surprise', the preface was allowed for some to read in the WMSCOG.
The brother that tried to take my picture acted like he didn't know what book I was talking about. I repeated the title several times and he said, 'Oh, the Green Book?' or 'Oh, the video Armor of God.' I hate when members play dumb. He later confessed he knew about the book then wanted to know where I read it. To his 'surprise', the preface was allowed for some to read in the WMSCOG.
Problem with New Jerusalem and women veil Book was re-printed for the second time when Ahn Shang Hong was alive. So, there is no argument it is clear that only one god exits. Noooooooooo Mother GOD.
Problem with New Jerusalem and women veil Book was re-printed for the second time when Ahn Shang Hong was alive. So, there is no argument it is clear that only one god exits. Noooooooooo Mother GOD.
I agree with God my love,
I agree with God my love,
I wonder what their new excuse will be to “counter” this fact. They claimed the book was written to counter Um Sooin and the book was collected from the members. It didn’t make sense with the expense of publishing a book to recollect the book. But anyway now that we know it was republished before the Passover when he allegedly revealed Chang as the bride, clearly the WMSCOG concept doesn’t add up.
I wonder what their new excuse will be to “counter” this fact. They claimed the book was written to counter Um Sooin and the book was collected from the members. It didn’t make sense with the expense of publishing a book to recollect the book. But anyway now that we know it was republished before the Passover when he allegedly revealed Chang as the bride, clearly the WMSCOG concept doesn’t add up.
They could probably convingly enough convince members it wasn't "actually" republished
They could probably convingly enough convince members it wasn't "actually" republished
This book is powerful. I must say for those who have loved ones on the inside, try to get them to read it. I have heard of some recent "demotions" of leaders in the church due to asking questions about the book. Why is it so negative for anyone to ask questions? Everyone should be free to ask questions and get answers if the events in question really happened. The church has tried to hide and lie about this book so much because it is in direct conflict with their teaching. Anyway the members are definitely talking, especially about the latest round of defections ๐
This book is powerful. I must say for those who have loved ones on the inside, try to get them to read it. I have heard of some recent "demotions" of leaders in the church due to asking questions about the book. Why is it so negative for anyone to ask questions? Everyone should be free to ask questions and get answers if the events in question really happened. The church has tried to hide and lie about this book so much because it is in direct conflict with their teaching. Anyway the members are definitely talking, especially about the latest round of defections ๐
I want to thank Ahnsahnghong (in my best Korean accent) for writing this book. Out of all he did, this was certainly the most beneficial for our time. It has become a thorn in John Lee’s side. A member read the book & started asking questions. His response was “forget what you read”. He basically told them to un-see what they read. RIDICULOUS!!!! The walls are crumbling down on him. He had to go back to Korea to find out from GP what to do next. LOL. Sitting on the sidelines getting in that last laugh before the final last laugh. The sermons are becoming more & more unstable.
I want to thank Ahnsahnghong (in my best Korean accent) for writing this book. Out of all he did, this was certainly the most beneficial for our time. It has become a thorn in John Lee’s side. A member read the book & started asking questions. His response was “forget what you read”. He basically told them to un-see what they read. RIDICULOUS!!!! The walls are crumbling down on him. He had to go back to Korea to find out from GP what to do next. LOL. Sitting on the sidelines getting in that last laugh before the final last laugh. The sermons are becoming more & more unstable.
A long time back, while my friend in the wmscog was still open to communication, I had asked her about this book. Her response was too funny. It was reminiscent of a literary character called Billy Bunter I used to enjoy reading about in my childhood.
She basically said that there is no such book it is only a rumour created to discredit the wmscog. She went on to say that he had a good reason for writing the book, which she had moments before declared did not exist. This was exactly the way I remember Billy Bunter reacted when he had been caught in a misadventure.
A long time back, while my friend in the wmscog was still open to communication, I had asked her about this book. Her response was too funny. It was reminiscent of a literary character called Billy Bunter I used to enjoy reading about in my childhood.
She basically said that there is no such book it is only a rumour created to discredit the wmscog. She went on to say that he had a good reason for writing the book, which she had moments before declared did not exist. This was exactly the way I remember Billy Bunter reacted when he had been caught in a misadventure.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.