[Emily]

Just read this article today that was posted on a Canadian site.  This statement stood out…"The fact that there is no biological necessity for physical life to be given by mothers caused Deacon August Kruesi to wonder: what was God’s will in creating the human life system in this way?"

http://life.nationalpost.com/2013/11/12/god-the-mother-in-the-world-mission-society-church-of-god/

 

What does he mean by "no biological necessity"?  What does he mean by "physical life to be given"?  The last time I checked, men can't give birth because they lack a uterus among other things.  

The point the speakers and or wms seem to try to make, albeit unclearly, is that because a mother is necessary to reproduce, then there must be a mother god.  They have not proven that at all in their article.  Of course this only applies to creatures that require a mother and father to reproduce.  What do the living organisms that do not require a male and female to reproduce "prove"?    

Sounds like a bunch of pseudoscience to me.

What do you guys think?