- Topic
NOTICE TO CARLOS DOE (SECOND)
To: Carlos Doe who has posted, edited or otherwise made the statements located at: https://www.examiningthewmscog.com/forum/topic.php?id=4659&page=4#post-35029. Specifically, the following two statements:
“Perreira certification…..aka formerly Deacon AC now Missionary AC and also known as "Mac" is a part time fry cook and barely owns the clothes on his back "allegedly"let alone the lincoln grill. Hey, Mac, hows Davina? Yeah everybody knows about that too! Hmmm wonder if Mac's wife knows about that?”
“John and Davina were an arranged marriage……Davina told me this herself!
Davina and Mac are together…..Davina told me this herself!
Davina uses "sexual inuendo" to recruit male members……Davina told me this herself!
Davina will say or do anything to get someone to join…….Davina told me this herself!
I guess she could have made the whole thing up but I don't think so because we were very good friends and she seemed very proud of it. I would not normally divulge information like this but she never said it was a secret and ever since i left she has been spreading terrible lies about me. I know this for a fact because there is someone she is still friends with who tells me everything she says.
My mind is very clear these days, I remember a lot of things but I have trouble remembering last names of former friends I don't know why that is. Does anyone know?”
You are hereby notified that a lawsuit has been filed that, among other items, seeks a court order to compel the disclosure of the identity of the person who posted these statements. If you are the posters of the statements that are referenced above, and you do not want your identity disclosed, you should so notify the following parties and the Court. This will entitle you to appear in the matter (presumably through counsel who will not disclose your identity; but you may certainly appear pro se if that is your wish) so that you or your counsel can oppose this relief.
We believe you have retained Thomas J. Giblin and filed a motion for protective order. Nevertheless, you have until Monday, June 15, 2015 to file and serve opposition to the currently pending application. Any such opposition must be served simultaneously upon both Intellectual Freedom Foundation, Inc. through its attorney Paul S. Grosswald, Esq. at [email protected] and to the plaintiffs through their attorneys Nissenbaum Law Group, LLC at [email protected] and also filed with the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County, Attn: Honorable John Langan, J.S.C., 10 Main Street, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601.
To identify the pending motion, please refer in your opposition to Mauro et als. v. Intellectual Freedom Foundation, Inc, Docket No. BER-L-9736-13.
Plaintiffs Council is getting better at this! This time the topic refers to the specific person Plaintiffs Council wants to get the attention of instead of vaguely putting "Notice to forum" so that most people who read it thought the entire forum of posters was being sued. That could have been seen (and was seen) by many, as a cleverly veiled attempt to intimidate everyone into not posting here. It brought to mind the question of why Plaintiffs Council just didn't narrow things down in the first place, instad of making a very vague statement that could be misread. "Was it a mistake," many wondered. Others wondered, "Do attorneys usually make mistakes or oversights like that?" Well, not usually, in the opinion of many. So then others questioned,"Then what would be the purpose of doing that?" I don't know the answers to these questions, but I have my opinions as well.
Brilliant! Does your god condone such behaviour? Is this the same merciful Jesus like 2000 ears ago? Remember how He persecuted people and sued them all the time? Cause I sure don't.
Just curious, Plaintiffs Council is calling out for everyones "real name" when "Plaintiffs Council" is a John Doe alias! Very strange isn't it? Who are you Plaintiffs Council Doe?
Joshua wrote:
Just curious, Plaintiffs Council is calling out for everyones "real name" when "Plaintiffs Council" is a John Doe alias! Very strange isn't it? Who are you Plaintiffs Council Doe?
That's a great question! Who is plaintiffs council Doe?
Sally wrote:
Joshua wrote:
Just curious, Plaintiffs Council is calling out for everyones "real name" when "Plaintiffs Council" is a John Doe alias! Very strange isn't it? Who are you Plaintiffs Council Doe?
That's a great question! Who is plaintiffs council Doe?
I wonder if they know who they really represent?
More Bullying Plaintiffs Counsel! If you are going to try and bully us into believing you, then maybe you should prove it by showing us the Documents. Put up or shut up!
These guys……. how funny! I wonder why this was not sent as a private message?? Hmmn… might it be that this is just another intimidation tactic to get people to shut up? Hence, putting it up for the whole world to see? Yes…. and the evidence is just this; That it was made public.
In any event, you have until May 7, 2015 to file and serve opposition to the currently pending application.
Nevertheless, you have until Monday, June 15, 2015 to file and serve opposition to the currently pending application.
How many times will you kick the can down the road, Plaintiff's Counsel?
Quote from Upton Sinclair, Pulitzer prize winner,"It's hard to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on him NOT understanding it." Could this quote be applied to the lawyers for the WMS? Could this quote also be applied to the leaders of the WMS?
Wouldn’t it be funny if WMS hired attorneys that are Scientologists (because defending and filing lawsuits for cults is their speciality) and the money that WMS is paying is going straight into the pockets of Scientology?! I would pay to see a WMS deacon debate an OT VIII Scientologist on which one holds the “only truth”!!
Ms Freedom wrote:
Wouldn't it be funny if WMS hired attorneys that are Scientologists (because defending and filing lawsuits for cults is their speciality) and the money that WMS is paying is going straight into the pockets of Scientology?! I would pay to see a WMS deacon debate an OT VIII Scientologist on which one holds the "only truth"!!
Lol! That would be pretty funny! I doubt there are that many lawyers in the WMS so I am assuming most of their legal counsel is from what they like to call "non-believers." Why would they turn to people who don't believe in their "Mother God" to defend "Mother God" or help "Mother" persecute others? (God persecuting people is a contradiction right there) I thought all non believers were supposed to be children of Satan. So they want children of Satan to do their dirty work? Ok, this is all too much contradiction. The real God doesn't need lawyers.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.