- Topic
So take it court Joshua, without proof, even testimony does not hold up. Don't compare yours or others word to that of the apostles and God, the bible is testimony from prophets moved by the holy spirit so don't even think their words are the same, as we can see with Dianes testimony PEOPLE lie. Go back and watch her "testimony" if even I can see the faults in it a lawyer would rip it apart throw it right back in her face.
48:40 Daine sounds pretty upset no one called her after she left "Not one person" Almost looks like she was really upset about it.
Diane even says the pastor called looking for her.After service hmm she was sick for four days. Guess who else Call her, the one we call Mother herself? hmm even to mock her, I wonder which is no one or some called.
So is this another one of those testimonies your talking about Joshua?
By your logic a person can claim you physically assaulted them and get a court to convict you with just their testimony, but with out the scratches and bruises there testimony is pointless, just same you need physical evidence.
I’m convinced it hasn’t happened though, but that’s me. Also baffled at some of the explanations they give.
Sarah2013 wrote:
I'm convinced it hasn't happened though, but that's me. Also baffled at some of the explanations they give.
Like which one? What do you think about the Euphrates river? I think that's rather compelling evidence. But that and the WWII prediction are the only things that I think I can say I actually believe are acceptable interpretations.
Their interpretation of this chapter verses as you explained they see it: “Rev 6:12-14 The WMSCOG says this is a prophecy of when Jerusalem was surrounded and many Jews were killed. Also, of WWII when, again, many Jews were killed. The stars and the figs represent Jews.”
I read down to verse 17.
Even now, there are many rumours of underground literal bases.
Sarah2013 wrote:
Their interpretation of this chapter verses as you explained they see it: "Rev 6:12-14 The WMSCOG says this is a prophecy of when Jerusalem was surrounded and many Jews were killed. Also, of WWII when, again, many Jews were killed. The stars and the figs represent Jews."
I read down to verse 17.
Even now, there are many rumours of underground literal bases.
I don't understand. Are you agreeing or showing me a flaw?
I don’t agree with their interpretation of that.
renita.payno wrote:
genny wrote:
renita.payno wrote:
The sun turned black: They say it means the law of Christ is lost. The moon turned red: I think this is talking about the law of Moses. Stars fell from the sky: Gen 15:15 the stars are Jews. Figs fell from a strong wind: Lk 13:6-9 Figs are Jews. Is 5:28 Wind is war. Heavens receding, mountains moved: Atomic bomb. They have proof Rev 16:12 already happened.
I think you meant Rev. 6:12?
If they say the sixth seal has already happened, then what do they say seals 1-5 were? They must have happened before seal 6.
No, I was right. Rev 16:12 is about the river that dried up. They say the 1st 6 cups and the 1st 6 seals have already passed. I can't remember exactly what the horses mean but they are people. The white horse is the Christ. I think the red one is satan. I brought up the cups, too, because the WMSCOG doesn't believe that these events are to happen all at once like some other churches teach. The cups and seals overlap.
Sorry I thought you were referring to the sun turning black and the moon red etc.
I'd really like to know what they say the seals and cups were in history. And how about the trumpets in Rev. 8 and 9? Did those happen too, according to the wmscog?
renita.payno wrote:
Sarah2013 wrote:
I'm convinced it hasn't happened though, but that's me. Also baffled at some of the explanations they give.
Like which one? What do you think about the Euphrates river? I think that's rather compelling evidence. But that and the WWII prediction are the only things that I think I can say I actually believe are acceptable interpretations.
What do you mean about the Euphrates River?
Rev 16:12 It's all dried up now.
renita.payno wrote:
Rev 16:12 It's all dried up now.
When did it dry up? As far as I know it's not dry now. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphrates_river)
There was some news article in 2009 I believe about it drying up.
its drying up yes but it hasn't yet
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.