- CreatorTopic
- February 8, 2013 at 10:37 AM#7114ElievalkyrieParticipant
One of our members, lng, shared a link about on how cults works (generally) and I liked it so I decided to post it here so that everyone can see and read, so that if ever you encounter one again, the warning signs can flash in your mind and make you aware that they are acting kinda, for the lack of a better word, "culty".
I took it from here http://www.howcultswork.com/ but will just post the Key Points and the modern definition:
Mind control Cult – any group which employs mind control and deceptive recruiting techniques. In other words cults trick people into joining and coerce them into staying.
Key points:
1. No legitimate group needs to lie or mislead you about what they practice and believe.
2. Any group which says that you must belong to their organization to be saved is almost certainly a cult.
3. Character assasination (It's when the person tries to argue and his character is personally attack but doesn't answer his argument and only makes him feel guilty for arguing) is a sure sign of cult.
4. Cult members are usually very fearful of disobeying or disagreeing in any way with their leadership. Healthy organizations however are not threatened by openly debating issues.
5. Beward of "instant friends", remember true friendships develop over time.
6. Beward of a group that tells you who you can and cannot see.
7. If you are instructed by a group not to read information critical of the group, then that is a sign of a cult.
8. Legitimate groups have nothing to fear from their members reading critical information about them.
9. Is information you expected to be kept confidential reported to leadership? If so, then it's a cult.
10. Never-ending COMPULSORY meetings and tasks is a sign of a cult.
11. Be especially eager to surf the net if your leaders have told you not to.
- February 10, 2013 at 6:42 AM #52584
gennyParticipantSarah2013 wrote:
Genny, I just fell outta my bed laughing. Enough!
I didn't mean to be funny. But it's always good to be able to laugh. 🙂
February 10, 2013 at 6:45 AM #52585
Sarah2013ParticipantGood medicine It is. Thank God we can still laugh.
February 10, 2013 at 6:53 AM #52586
ElievalkyrieParticipantThe original topic I posted was from lng, also our forum member. But personally, I follow this webiste http://www.prem-rawat-talk.org/forum/uploads/CultCharacteristics.htm as a basis for cult criteria. This is from experts that studied the known cults and some know from firsthand experience.
If you look at this website, it is stated here >>> (Please note that a group doesn't need to have all the characteristics in any one list to really be a destructive cult. If a group has more than half of the cult characteristics in any of the lists below, then you should be concerned. So if you read the list that the American Family Foundation gave, can you see any differences with wmscog or not? Here let me post it again. So looking at the 14 characteristics, can you say that wmscog doesn't fit it?
1. The group is focused on a living leader to whom members seem to display excessively zealous, unquestioning commitment.
2. The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.
3. The group is preoccupied with making money.
4. Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.
5. Mind-numbing techniques (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, debilitating work routines) are used to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).
6. The leadership dictates sometimes in great detail how members should think, act, and feel (for example: members must get permission from leaders to date, change jobs, get married; leaders may prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, how to discipline children, and so forth).
7. The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s), and members (for example: the leader is considered the Messiah or an avatar; the group and/or the leader has a special mission to save humanity).
8. The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which causes conflict with the wider society.
9. The group's leader is not accountable to any authorities (as are, for example, military commanders and ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream denominations).
10. The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify means that members would have considered unethical before joining the group (for example: collecting money for bogus charities).
11. The leadership induces guilt feelings in members in order to control them.
12. Members' subservience to the group causes them to cut ties with family and friends, and to give up personal goals and activities that were of interest before joining the group.
13. Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group.
14. Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.
Please don't get offended, I am asking a question here and am not being sarcastic. I just want your honest opinion.
But since you might be thinking that I am being unfair in focusing only with the wmscog then I will also evaluate my own religion (Reformation-Calvinism group) using these criteria and I can honestly say that I don't find any of these characteristics with my religion. I guess I could say that we also have the characteristic number 8 but not to the extent that I am surely thinking that people not from our group is from Satan and is not going to Heaven so the score still returns to 0.
February 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM #52587
WMS brotherParticipant"He would not, for example, be a person who worshipped cows or prayed to Buddha"
Sure He could. It was contradictory for God to appear as a sinful "worm" such as a human man, who is a manifest sinner, but God did that Sin as Jesus. There is no rules governing what God is not allowed to do, and I would be careful before judging them -outside- of the context of God's own promises.
"So looking at the 14 characteristics, can you say that wmscog doesn't fit it?"
I think that you should read the way the Bible defines a cult, and how the Bible defines the true church.
You'll notice when doing so both examples of true Christianity and Sun God Worship get mixed results on your chart.
I repeat, that chart is not accurate concerning Christian doctrine, nor Jewish doctrine.
February 10, 2013 at 4:44 PM #52588
gennyParticipantWMS brother wrote:
"He would not, for example, be a person who worshipped cows or prayed to Buddha"
Sure He could. It was contradictory for God to appear as a sinful "worm" such as a human man, who is a manifest sinner, but God did that Sin as Jesus. There is no rules governing what God is not allowed to do, and I would be careful before judging them -outside- of the context of God's own promises.
Are you saying that Jesus was a sinner?
And if you think that God would worship cows or pray to Buddha, please provide a scripture reference for any time when God says it's ok to worship a false god, or anything else besides the one true God.
February 10, 2013 at 5:14 PM #52589
ElievalkyrieParticipantWMS brother wrote:
"He would not, for example, be a person who worshipped cows or prayed to Buddha"
Sure He could. It was contradictory for God to appear as a sinful "worm" such as a human man, who is a manifest sinner, but God did that Sin as Jesus. There is no rules governing what God is not allowed to do, and I would be careful before judging them -outside- of the context of God's own promises.
"So looking at the 14 characteristics, can you say that wmscog doesn't fit it?"
I think that you should read the way the Bible defines a cult, and how the Bible defines the true church.
You'll notice when doing so both examples of true Christianity and Sun God Worship get mixed results on your chart.
I repeat, that chart is not accurate concerning Christian doctrine, nor Jewish doctrine.
The most common characteristics the wmscog members have is that they do not answer your question directly. I don't know if they do it deliberately or it just comes naturally to them. If you observe the above statements… WMS brother could just have answered either Yes or No. But he didn't. Am I to assume that you do found many similarities and are unwilling to admit it WMS brother?
February 10, 2013 at 9:50 PM #52590
SimonParticipantit is worth noting Buddhists don't pray to anyone
February 11, 2013 at 2:44 AM #52591
WMS brotherParticipant"genny"
All men are sinners, anyone in the mortal flesh IS a sinner. This is the very reason why Muslims (and I have preached to quite a few) have said to me that they do not believe that its possible for God to take the form of mortal man, because God is perfect and not a sinner. Thus because all men are sinners, and God can -never- be a sinner, They argue that Jesus is not God.
I argue that God has the power to do anything at all, because God is Omnipotent, and its extremely presumptuous of man to dictate what God "can" or "cannot" do.
People who believe in the divinity of Christ Jesus, also argue that God will do as God pleases, even inhabiting a sinful body like Jesus.
The sin itself does not matter, for it is written: one who is guilty of breaking one of the laws, is guilty of breaking all of them.
There is no such thing as a "more severe" or "less severe" sin. Glancing at a woman is a sin. Everything, is a sin. It does not matter what kind of sin you commit, sin is sin.
Thus God is not bound by sin, and I would disregard any argument about God "sinning" unless it is something that is contradicting one of his promises to me. As long as I'm getting what I'm promised, it is not my place, nor anyone's place to question the method God desires to take.
"Job 25:6"
"how much less man, who is but a maggot–a son of man, who is only a worm!"
I believe that verse, among others, is the one which testifies to the manifest sinfulness of Mankind, who are born sinners.
To distinguish between sins is a waste of time, and the reason why I mocked it. A sin is a sin is a sin, and the wages for any sin is death. Absolute and clear-cut.
The Jews during the Time of Jesus mocked him for his sinning, and tried to trap him in sins. I can only imagine what events occured which were not included in the Bible. But, in reality, salvation matters, not trying to figure out how many wive's Jesus had (which is a moot point, and the moot point of that is my point.)
February 11, 2013 at 3:14 AM #52592
SimonParticipantWMS brother wrote:
There is no such thing as a "more severe" or "less severe" sin.
Ahnsahnhong wrote otherwise
February 11, 2013 at 4:26 AM #52593
WMS brotherParticipantCan you tell me where, and in which book? I have several of them, and I don't remember that at all.
Although it is prudent to mention, there is a difference between a -forgiveable- sin, and an -unforgiveable sin- in the Bible.
It is written, that a variety of Feasts, and also Baptism, grant you the forgiveness of Sins as a promise from God.
In the Bible, after you are taught the truth, and after you are baptised, and after you basically accept God as your saviour, if you THEN disgrace and deny God you have fallen away and there is no promise of Forgiveness anymore.
Although it is also prudent to mention that our all merciful God of Love brings people back into the truth as it pleases him; defaming Christ after being in the Truth makes you loose the "promise" of forgiveness.
Anyways…
Assuming that it was not a misunderstanding, I'll check this topic again sometime for other quotes and comments.
February 11, 2013 at 5:26 AM #52594
ElievalkyrieParticipantWMS brother wrote:
"genny"
All men are sinners, anyone in the mortal flesh IS a sinner. This is the very reason why Muslims (and I have preached to quite a few) have said to me that they do not believe that its possible for God to take the form of mortal man, because God is perfect and not a sinner. Thus because all men are sinners, and God can -never- be a sinner, They argue that Jesus is not God.
I argue that God has the power to do anything at all, because God is Omnipotent, and its extremely presumptuous of man to dictate what God "can" or "cannot" do.
People who believe in the divinity of Christ Jesus, also argue that God will do as God pleases, even inhabiting a sinful body like Jesus.
The sin itself does not matter, for it is written: one who is guilty of breaking one of the laws, is guilty of breaking all of them.
There is no such thing as a "more severe" or "less severe" sin. Glancing at a woman is a sin. Everything, is a sin. It does not matter what kind of sin you commit, sin is sin.
Thus God is not bound by sin, and I would disregard any argument about God "sinning" unless it is something that is contradicting one of his promises to me. As long as I'm getting what I'm promised, it is not my place, nor anyone's place to question the method God desires to take.
So your saying God in the form of man, can lie, steal, commit adultery and predict falsely and men cannot do anything about it? They STILL have to believe He is God?
"Job 25:6"
"how much less man, who is but a maggot–a son of man, who is only a worm!"
I believe that verse, among others, is the one which testifies to the manifest sinfulness of Mankind, who are born sinners.
To distinguish between sins is a waste of time, and the reason why I mocked it. A sin is a sin is a sin, and the wages for any sin is death. Absolute and clear-cut.
The Jews during the Time of Jesus mocked him for his sinning, and tried to trap him in sins. I can only imagine what events occured which were not included in the Bible. But, in reality, salvation matters, not trying to figure out how many wive's Jesus had (which is a moot point, and the moot point of that is my point.)
Jesus did not commit any sin known to man, He was ACCUSED but was proven NOT GUILTY. The bible even said that Pontius Pilate and officials find him FAULTLESS.
February 11, 2013 at 5:59 AM #52595
SimonParticipantI’ll have to look it up I just remember he wrote about varying sentences different sin
February 11, 2013 at 6:00 AM #52596
gennyParticipantWMSbrother, you wrote a lot but I don't see you directly answering the point anywhere. So then, I think you are saying that yes, Jesus was sinful. Is that what you meant?
February 11, 2013 at 6:16 AM #52597
WMS brotherParticipantAhn-Sahng-Hong did not predict falsely, or steal, or lie, so that is not relevant, and in fact only inflammatory.
But to answer the question anyway, in theory, yes he could.
In fact I think I remember verses about Jesus working on the Sabbath, and his answer was that "Even God works on the sabbath" even though working on the sabbath was a sin. Yeah lets go with that, Jesus is blatantly admitting that working on the Sabbath, which is a sin, is something that God does all the time, just by the very nature of being God.
"Jesus did not commit any sin known to man"
Psalm 51:5 "For I was born a sinner–yes, from the moment my mother conceived me."
It is the testimony of the bible that all people are born sinners. Yes. Jesus was a sinner. He was born a sinner, in the body of a sinner. The bible says so.
It is -despite- this, that he becomes the pure sacrifice without blemish. But you cannot ignore that the bible testifies we are all sinners from birth, all flesh is sin. Jesus overcomes this, because God is awesome.
February 11, 2013 at 6:31 AM #52598
gennyParticipantWMS brother wrote:
It is the testimony of the bible that all people are born sinners. Yes. Jesus was a sinner. He was born a sinner, in the body of a sinner. The bible says so.
Hebrews 4:15, "For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet was without sin."
It is -despite- this, that he becomes the pure sacrifice without blemish. But you cannot ignore that the bible testifies we are all sinners from birth, all flesh is sin. Jesus overcomes this, because God is awesome.
Jesus was different because He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:20)
February 11, 2013 at 7:08 AM #52599
ElievalkyrieParticipantWMS brother wrote:
Ahn-Sahng-Hong did not predict falsely, or steal, or lie, so that is not relevant, and in fact only inflammatory.
According to sources, he did predict falsely which means he lied. I noticed you didn't deny that the part when I said committed adultery, am I to assume you know he did committed it? If it is true, then that means he just stole another man's wife. Overall, Ahn did steal, lie and predict falsely.
But to answer the question anyway, in theory, yes he could.
In fact I think I remember verses about Jesus working on the Sabbath, and his answer was that "Even God works on the sabbath" even though working on the sabbath was a sin. Yeah lets go with that, Jesus is blatantly admitting that working on the Sabbath, which is a sin, is something that God does all the time, just by the very nature of being God.
It was NOT a sin to heal on Sabbath days.
Again
"Jesus did not commit any sin known to man"
Psalm 51:5 "For I was born a sinner–yes, from the moment my mother conceived me."
This did not mean Jesus, this was for the people. Jesus was NOT conceived in sin because the Holy Spirit entered Mary to create Him, not Joseph. Though Mary was a sinner also, it doesn't matter. Because the bible says in Romans 5:12, sin enters through the man, not the woman.
It is the testimony of the bible that all people are born sinners. Yes. Jesus was a sinner. He was born a sinner, in the body of a sinner. The bible says so.
Jesus is not a sinner. That is pure blasphemy. God never sins. And if God can do it, that means it is GOOD because God can only do good, that means I can follow His example, that means I can also do what He does because it means that He does it, it is good.
It is -despite- this, that he becomes the pure sacrifice without blemish. But you cannot ignore that the bible testifies we are all sinners from birth, all flesh is sin. Jesus overcomes this, because God is awesome.
I am so flabbergasted on how the wmscog twisted the Bible so much.
February 11, 2013 at 7:09 AM #52600
ElievalkyrieParticipantNow I know why they called Ahn heretical.
February 11, 2013 at 7:22 AM #52601
SimonParticipantRomans 5:12 is about the fall but the passing of sin parent to child
February 11, 2013 at 7:33 AM #52602
ElievalkyrieParticipantExactly Simon. The sin entered through one man, it is very specific. It did not say through Adam and Eve but just "one man" Because of Adam, sin entered the world, sin was passed down from parent to child. That was why God made Mary pregnant with the Holy Spirit, not Joseph so that Jesus can be man yet holy. You can even see in the bible it was stated, Joseph had no union with Mary until Jesus was born (Matthew 1:25) so that it is without doubt that Joseph was not able to taint Jesus while He was still in Mary's womb.
February 11, 2013 at 7:37 AM #52603
SimonParticipantthat’s a lot of adding to scripture. Adam was the one who wasn’t deceived by the serpent so THAT is less of a leap to claim as the reason he pinned on Adam over patrilineal descent of sin
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.