- CreatorTopic
- June 20, 2013 at 9:27 PM#7408Love'n HoneyParticipant
The Plaintiff's motion was denied.
- June 24, 2013 at 4:37 AM #63404
emilParticipantIf they have to keep paying costs everytime they lose a lawsuit, it might just highlight that fact to their members. So far they have been telling members they are winning lawsuits.
June 24, 2013 at 4:37 AM #28946
emilParticipantIf they have to keep paying costs everytime they lose a lawsuit, it might just highlight that fact to their members. So far they have been telling members they are winning lawsuits.
June 24, 2013 at 6:28 PM #28957
Love'n HoneyParticipantI find this insulting. The leadership in the WMSCOG is literally treating the members like idiots. It is common knowledge that, as long as you have the case number, you can go online and check the status of a lawsuit. This is why I made the title of this thread the actual case number. I even included the case number in the title of one of my videos to encourage people to go online and check the status. It is because the WMSCOG encourages the members not to think for themselves that they haven't gone online to see how badly their gods are losing against "mere man."
June 24, 2013 at 6:28 PM #63405
Love'n HoneyParticipantI find this insulting. The leadership in the WMSCOG is literally treating the members like idiots. It is common knowledge that, as long as you have the case number, you can go online and check the status of a lawsuit. This is why I made the title of this thread the actual case number. I even included the case number in the title of one of my videos to encourage people to go online and check the status. It is because the WMSCOG encourages the members not to think for themselves that they haven't gone online to see how badly their gods are losing against "mere man."
June 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM #28959
DisturbedParticipant@Renita…would you mind putting the court website information? I searched Los Angeles superior court and the system couldnt locate the case number. I just want to check the correct website and the correct area on the website so I can see the case. Thank you
June 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM #63406
DisturbedParticipant@Renita…would you mind putting the court website information? I searched Los Angeles superior court and the system couldnt locate the case number. I just want to check the correct website and the correct area on the website so I can see the case. Thank you
June 24, 2013 at 8:02 PM #63407
Love'n HoneyParticipantJune 24, 2013 at 8:02 PM #28960
Love'n HoneyParticipantJune 24, 2013 at 8:13 PM #63408
DisturbedParticipantok i found it. For some reason I left off the last digit in the case number. Thank you. I am able to see the results.
June 24, 2013 at 8:13 PM #28961
DisturbedParticipantok i found it. For some reason I left off the last digit in the case number. Thank you. I am able to see the results.
July 24, 2013 at 11:35 PM #63409
TruthParticipantokay!! Enough is Enough! !! WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE!!!
I just heard that the Reseda church aka the John Lee so called Pastor is taking Diane Sims to court again!!!! Why don't they leave her alone? I haven't even seen or heard from her on the internet or anything for a few months.
Haven't they done enough to these people!!!!
July 24, 2013 at 11:35 PM #29826
TruthParticipantokay!! Enough is Enough! !! WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE!!!
I just heard that the Reseda church aka the John Lee so called Pastor is taking Diane Sims to court again!!!! Why don't they leave her alone? I haven't even seen or heard from her on the internet or anything for a few months.
Haven't they done enough to these people!!!!
July 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM #63410
TruthParticipantase Summary
<!– spacer –>
<!– this comment is required for IE browser to render the spacer –>
<!– Tabs Body –>
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC505762
WORLD MISSION SOCIETY CHURCH OF GOD VS DIANE SIMS ET AL
Filing Date: 04/12/2013
Case Type: Injunct Relief-not Dom/Harrassmt (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
<!– seperator –>
Future Hearings
08/14/2013 at 08:30 am in department 41 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management
<!– seperator –>
Parties
DOES 1 THROUGH 50 – Defendant/Respondent
FREEDMAN + TAITELMAN LLP – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
SIMS DIANE – Defendant/Respondent
SIMS JEFF – Defendant/Respondent
WORLD MISSION SOCIETY CHURCH OF GOD – Plaintiff/Petitioner
<!– seperator –>
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
06/26/2013 Notice-Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk
06/24/2013 Notice of Ruling (OF ORDER )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
06/20/2013 Order (tentative decision )
Filed by Court
06/19/2013 Opposition Points & Authorities (to m/order to show cause re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt
06/19/2013 Exhibit
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/17/2013 Brief-Reply (in support of m/osc re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/17/2013 Brief-Reply (in support of m/order osc re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/14/2013 Opposition Document
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
06/14/2013 Proof of Service
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
06/05/2013 Amended Proof of Service
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/23/2013 Motion (FOR OSC RE CONTEMPT )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/03/2013 Ex-parte Request for Order
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
05/03/2013 Reply/Response (TO EX PARTE APPLICATIONS )
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
04/30/2013 Ex-Parte Application (for osc re:contempt against renita payno )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
04/30/2013 Ex-Parte Application (for osc re: contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
04/12/2013 Complaint
04/12/2013 Ex-Parte Application (FOR OSC AND TRO )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
<!– seperator –>
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)
06/20/2013 at 09:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Motion (FOR OSC RE CONTEMPT) – Denied
05/03/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 19, Joseph R. Kalin, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Denied without prejudice
04/30/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Denied
04/12/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Court makes order
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
July 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM #29827
TruthParticipantase Summary
<!– spacer –>
<!– this comment is required for IE browser to render the spacer –>
<!– Tabs Body –>
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC505762
WORLD MISSION SOCIETY CHURCH OF GOD VS DIANE SIMS ET AL
Filing Date: 04/12/2013
Case Type: Injunct Relief-not Dom/Harrassmt (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending
<!– seperator –>
Future Hearings
08/14/2013 at 08:30 am in department 41 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management
<!– seperator –>
Parties
DOES 1 THROUGH 50 – Defendant/Respondent
FREEDMAN + TAITELMAN LLP – Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
SIMS DIANE – Defendant/Respondent
SIMS JEFF – Defendant/Respondent
WORLD MISSION SOCIETY CHURCH OF GOD – Plaintiff/Petitioner
<!– seperator –>
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
06/26/2013 Notice-Case Management Conference
Filed by Clerk
06/24/2013 Notice of Ruling (OF ORDER )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
06/20/2013 Order (tentative decision )
Filed by Court
06/19/2013 Opposition Points & Authorities (to m/order to show cause re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt
06/19/2013 Exhibit
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/17/2013 Brief-Reply (in support of m/osc re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/17/2013 Brief-Reply (in support of m/order osc re contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
06/14/2013 Opposition Document
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
06/14/2013 Proof of Service
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
06/05/2013 Amended Proof of Service
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/23/2013 Motion (FOR OSC RE CONTEMPT )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/03/2013 Ex-parte Request for Order
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
05/03/2013 Reply/Response (TO EX PARTE APPLICATIONS )
Filed by Defendant & Defendant in Pro Per
04/30/2013 Ex-Parte Application (for osc re:contempt against renita payno )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
04/30/2013 Ex-Parte Application (for osc re: contempt )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
04/12/2013 Complaint
04/12/2013 Ex-Parte Application (FOR OSC AND TRO )
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr
<!– seperator –>
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)
06/20/2013 at 09:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Motion (FOR OSC RE CONTEMPT) – Denied
05/03/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 19, Joseph R. Kalin, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Denied without prejudice
04/30/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Denied
04/12/2013 at 08:30 am in Department 85, James C. Chalfant, Presiding
Exparte proceeding – Court makes order
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
July 25, 2013 at 3:32 AM #63411
LoveParticipant**Whatever you do or say, let it be done or said with love**
who ever have post this message I respect him. because if we believe in Almighty GOD then whatever you do or say, let it be done or said with love. 100 like for this message.
July 25, 2013 at 3:32 AM #29829
LoveParticipant**Whatever you do or say, let it be done or said with love**
who ever have post this message I respect him. because if we believe in Almighty GOD then whatever you do or say, let it be done or said with love. 100 like for this message.
July 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM #63412
FreedfromresedaParticipantWhy dont they discuss all of the "losses" on this frivolous lawsuit?! They are clearly all about money, money, money! Greedy church. They want to stifle our right to freedom of speech, freedom to lawfully assemble, freedom of thought. This country is not a dictatorship and the sooner they realize that the better off everyone will be.
July 25, 2013 at 5:13 PM #29855
FreedfromresedaParticipantWhy dont they discuss all of the "losses" on this frivolous lawsuit?! They are clearly all about money, money, money! Greedy church. They want to stifle our right to freedom of speech, freedom to lawfully assemble, freedom of thought. This country is not a dictatorship and the sooner they realize that the better off everyone will be.
July 25, 2013 at 6:46 PM #63413
Love'n HoneyParticipantThanks, Love. =)
This is soooo crazy!! Diane, if you're reading this, send me a message and let me know if supporters can be present at the next hearing. I want to go. I'm here for you! In the flesh. =)
July 25, 2013 at 6:46 PM #29859
Love'n HoneyParticipantThanks, Love. =)
This is soooo crazy!! Diane, if you're reading this, send me a message and let me know if supporters can be present at the next hearing. I want to go. I'm here for you! In the flesh. =)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.