- CreatorTopic
- February 15, 2013 at 4:00 AM#7134
- July 27, 2013 at 5:23 AM #53810
adminKeymasterJuly 27, 2013 at 11:30 PM #29908
adminParticipantMotion to Dismiss Hearing Transcript 01/11/13
Transcript of the NJ Motion to Dismiss Hearing
July 27, 2013 at 11:30 PM #53811
adminKeymasterMotion to Dismiss Hearing Transcript 01/11/13
Transcript of the NJ Motion to Dismiss Hearing
July 30, 2013 at 4:53 PM #53812
Love'n HoneyParticipantadmin wrote:
Aw!! I can't see it.. Why did they withdraw?
July 30, 2013 at 4:53 PM #29952
Love'n HoneyParticipantadmin wrote:
Aw!! I can't see it.. Why did they withdraw?
July 30, 2013 at 9:17 PM #29958
EmilyParticipantJohn Dozier (owner of the law firm) died.
July 30, 2013 at 9:17 PM #53813
EmilyParticipantJohn Dozier (owner of the law firm) died.
July 31, 2013 at 5:16 AM #29962
emilParticipantEmily wrote:
John Dozier (owner of the law firm) died.
I was wondering about this when I first read about it when it was posted on the website.
How do they spin this one that the attorney fighting on behalf of "god" died and resulted in them withdrawing.
July 31, 2013 at 5:16 AM #53814
emilParticipantEmily wrote:
John Dozier (owner of the law firm) died.
I was wondering about this when I first read about it when it was posted on the website.
How do they spin this one that the attorney fighting on behalf of "god" died and resulted in them withdrawing.
August 7, 2013 at 11:14 PM #29148
adminParticipantMotion to Dismiss Decision and Order 08/07/13
Here are some bullet points regarding Judge Harz’s decision on Colón’s Motion to Dismiss.
1. All claims against Defendant Newton were dismissed.
2. All claims against Defendant Colón by her former husband were dismissed.
3. The breach of contract claim was dismissed and the judge ruled that the non-disclosure agreement was “invalid and not binding between the parties”.
4. The Plaintiff’s claims for trade libel were dismissed.
5. Claims related to statements allegedly made by Defendant Colón at public variance hearings were dismissed.
6. The case will go into discovery as to the Plaintiff’s claims for defamation and conspiracy and false light/defamation by implication and conspiracy.
August 7, 2013 at 11:14 PM #53815
adminKeymasterMotion to Dismiss Decision and Order 08/07/13
Here are some bullet points regarding Judge Harz’s decision on Colón’s Motion to Dismiss.
1. All claims against Defendant Newton were dismissed.
2. All claims against Defendant Colón by her former husband were dismissed.
3. The breach of contract claim was dismissed and the judge ruled that the non-disclosure agreement was “invalid and not binding between the parties”.
4. The Plaintiff’s claims for trade libel were dismissed.
5. Claims related to statements allegedly made by Defendant Colón at public variance hearings were dismissed.
6. The case will go into discovery as to the Plaintiff’s claims for defamation and conspiracy and false light/defamation by implication and conspiracy.
August 8, 2013 at 3:31 AM #53816
MountainMomParticipantAll right! I like the sounds of "going into discovery!" It sounds like the wmscog would have to reveal some things there.
August 8, 2013 at 3:31 AM #29150
MountainMomParticipantAll right! I like the sounds of "going into discovery!" It sounds like the wmscog would have to reveal some things there.
August 8, 2013 at 7:50 AM #29153
God my loveParticipantGood to hear newton case are dismiss. this judgement seems god is with true people.
August 8, 2013 at 7:50 AM #53817
God my loveParticipantGood to hear newton case are dismiss. this judgement seems god is with true people.
August 10, 2013 at 12:20 AM #53818
adminKeymasterAugust 10, 2013 at 12:20 AM #29174
adminParticipantAugust 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM #29178
God my loveParticipantWhat I mean to say is case against newton is dismiss. This is good wmscog can’t do any thing.
August 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM #53819
God my loveParticipantWhat I mean to say is case against newton is dismiss. This is good wmscog can’t do any thing.
August 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM #29179
God my loveParticipantColon have not done any damage of wmscog but church have done many damage so church have to give compensation to former members.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.